Solving a PDE: Can Someone Help?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kaniello
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a partial differential equation (PDE) presented as a Riccati equation. Participants explore methods for finding a solution, including variable separation and integration techniques, while addressing the complexities involved in solving for the function of time.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant identifies the equation as a Riccati equation, suggesting it is more complex than it appears.
  • Another participant proposes that variable separation could be a viable method for solving the equation.
  • A different participant argues that while variable separation might work for a function of u, the original poster is looking for a solution for u(t), which complicates the problem.
  • Integration techniques are discussed, with one participant attempting to derive a solution through integration, leading to a hyperbolic function.
  • There is mention of a specific case where the equation simplifies, indicating that the general case is more challenging.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the complexity of the Riccati equation and the appropriateness of various solution methods. No consensus is reached on the best approach to solve the PDE.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the complexity of the Riccati equation can vary significantly depending on the constants involved, suggesting that assumptions about these constants may influence the solution methods discussed.

kaniello
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hallo,
I ended up with this PDE:

du/dt + A*u² =C

A and C are constants and U is only function of time.
It looks simple but...
Can someone help me?
Thanks a lot in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a Riccati equation, and indeed it is slightly more tricky than you may initially think.
 
Thank you so much! That was a quick answer!
 
@dextercioby. That would work to solve for a function of u (e.g. f(u) = ...) , but kaniello here is solving for the function u(t) that satisfies the ODE... a much tricker problem that satisfies the riccati equation.
 
Hmmm

[tex]\frac{du}{dt} = C-Au^2 \Rightarrow \int dt = \int\frac{du}{C-Au^2} \Rightarrow...[/tex]

??
 
..which would be
tanh⁻1([itex]\sqrt{a/c}[/itex] / (a/c).
I am currently studying the article from CompuChip and reference given there. Probably this is the solution that comes out from the Riccati equation setting q1=0, q0 and q2= const.
 
X89codered89X said:
@dextercioby. That would work to solve for a function of u (e.g. f(u) = ...) , but kaniello here is solving for the function u(t) that satisfies the ODE... a much tricker problem that satisfies the riccati equation.

CompuChip said:
It is a Riccati equation, and indeed it is slightly more tricky than you may initially think.

The Riccati equation is only "tricky" in the general case - for example when C in the OP's equation is replaced by something like [itex]Ct^n[/itex]

As dextercioby said, this special case is straighforward to integrate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K