MHB Solving a Polynomial Equation - Discussion in Fraleigh - Page 204

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving polynomial equations as presented in John Fraleigh's "A First Course in Abstract Algebra," specifically in Section 22: Rings of Polynomials. The key question raised is the relevance of the field \( F \) in the context of finding zeros of the polynomial \( x^2 + x - 6 \). It is established that while setting \( F = \mathbb{R} \) could yield the same results, the significance of \( F \) lies in its role in determining the nature of the polynomials and their coefficients, particularly in relation to classical problems of polynomial factorization over the integers and rationals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial equations and their roots
  • Familiarity with fields in abstract algebra, specifically \( \mathbb{Q} \) and \( \mathbb{R} \)
  • Knowledge of homomorphisms in algebraic structures
  • Basic concepts of polynomial factorization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of polynomial rings in abstract algebra
  • Learn about the implications of field extensions in polynomial equations
  • Research classical problems in polynomial factorization, particularly over \( \mathbb{Z} \) and \( \mathbb{Q} \)
  • Explore the concept of homomorphisms and their applications in algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians interested in polynomial theory, and educators teaching concepts related to polynomial equations and field theory.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading John Fraleigh's book, A First Course in Abstract Algebra.

I am at present reading Section 22: Rings of Polynomials.

I need some help with an aspect of Fraleigh's discussion of "solving a polynomial equation" or "finding a zero of a polynomial" ...

The relevant text in Fraleigh is as follows:View attachment 4560

In the above text, we read the following:

" ... ... In terms of this definition, we can rephrase the classical problem of finding all real numbers r such that $$r^2 + r - 6 = 0$$ by letting $$F = \mathbb{Q}$$ and $$E = \mathbb{R}$$ and finding all $$\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$$ such that

$$\phi_\alpha ( x^2 + x - 6 ) = 0
$$

that is finding all zeros of $$x^2 + x - 6$$ in $$\mathbb{R}$$ ... ... "My question is as follows:

What is the relevance of the field $$F$$? It appears that if we made $$F = \mathbb{R}$$ we would have achieved the same result ... .. indeed (if we regard a field as a subfield of itself) we could have taken $$F = E$$ and achieved the same result ...

Can someone please explain the relevance of the subfield $$F$$? ... ... I am sure that I am missing something ...

Peter
*** NOTE ***I do understand that changing $$F$$ changes the nature/type of the polynomials that can be input to the homomorphism $$\phi_\alpha$$ since the co-efficients of the polynomial come from $$F$$ ... but still do not really see the point or relevance of the subfield $$F$$ ...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

I could be wrong about this, but I think it comes down to the word "classical" used by Fraleigh. If I'm not mistaken, the classical problem is to split a polynomial over the integers, and it is known that this is equivalent to splitting a polynomial over the field $\mathbb{Q}$ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorization_of_polynomials)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
973
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
914
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K