Solving a polynomial of arbitrary powers

  • Thread starter Thread starter davee123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation W*C^(Z/A) = X*C^(Y/A) - D*X + D*W for the variable A, given that C>1 and assuming D=1 simplifies the problem. If Y and Z are known, substituting k=C^(1/A) can transform the equation into a more manageable polynomial form. However, if Y and Z are unknown, participants express difficulty in finding a solution. The conversation also clarifies that polynomials can involve rational numbers, not just positive integers, which may affect the approach to solving the equation. Overall, the challenge lies in determining A or B without sufficient known variables.
davee123
Messages
671
Reaction score
4
W*C^(Z/A) = X*C^(Y/A) - D*X + D*W

How do you go about solving for A?
Known: C>1
Also, if it makes it easier (it shouldn't) you can assume that D=1.

If Y and Z are known, I figure you can substitute k=C^(1/A), which turns it into a more trivial polynomial. But if Y and Z *aren't* known, I'm at a loss.

For the sake of reference, here's where the problem comes from:

I want a logarithmic function that I can use in a program I'm writing. Therefore, I'm guessing that I want an equation of the form:

f(x) = A*log(B*x + D) (that's log base C)

And I know that:
f(0) = 0
f(W) = Y
f(X) = Z

Since F(0) = 0, I can assume that D = 1. No problem.
And I don't really care what C is, nor do I think I ought to-- if it matters, I'm just assuming that C = e.

Plugging in W and solving for B in terms of A gives me:

B = (C^(Y/A) - D)/W

Plugging in X and solving for A gives me something I can't solve-- at least not in the general case:

W*C^(Z/A) = X*C^(Y/A) - D*X + D*W

[edit]
And if I do the reverse, and try solving for B instead of A, I get:

(B*W+D)^Z = (B*X+D)^Y

Which I similarly can't figure out how to solve for B.
[/edit]

DaveE
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, that's not a polynomial. Second, since it has nothing to do with "Linear and Abstract Algebra", I am moving this to "General Math".

If Y and Z are known, I figure you can substitute k=C^(1/A), which turns it into a more trivial polynomial. But if Y and Z *aren't* known, I'm at a loss.
I don't know why you would say that. You can solve FOR A in terms of the other constants. If you let k= C1/A you get
WkZ= XkY- DX+ DY

Now, if Z and Y are positive integers, that IS a polynomial. However, there are no general formulas for solving polynomials.
 
HallsofIvy said:
First, that's not a polynomial. Second, since it has nothing to do with "Linear and Abstract Algebra", I am moving this to "General Math".

D'oh! Yeah, I wasn't sure-- I figured I'd look for an "Algebra" forum, but that didn't exist.

HallsofIvy said:
I don't know why you would say that. You can solve FOR A in terms of the other constants. If you let k= C1/A you get
WkZ= XkY- DX+ DY

Now, if Z and Y are positive integers, that IS a polynomial.

Ahh, ok. I never realized polynomials required positive integers. Hm. I suppose as long as Z and Y are rational (and both positive or both negative), you could choose a better substitution that still turns it into a polynomial, but of course, there's still no guarantee.

DaveE
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K