Solving Absolute Value Problem | 3-x=x-3

Click For Summary
The absolute value equation |3-x|=x-3 leads to two cases: 3-x=x-3 and -(3-x)=x-3. The first case simplifies to x=3, while the second case results in the identity 0=0, which is true for all x. However, the condition 3-x ≤ 0 is only valid when x ≥ 3, indicating that the solution x=3 is the only valid solution. Thus, the discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the domain when solving absolute value equations. Understanding these cases clarifies why x must be greater than or equal to 3.
Polymath89
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I'm currently reviewing pre-calculus material and encountered a little problem with an absolute value expression.

|3-x|=x-3

Now the way I learned absolute value expressions was that there's a positive and a negative case. So I got:

3-x=x-3 x=3 and -(3-x)=x-3 gives 0=0. Stupid question, but isn't 0=0 in general valid for all values of x? And I don't understand how you get to the solution x≥3.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you distinguish two different cases, you should keep in mind where those cases apply. Here, your case ##3-x \leq 0## is valid for ##x \geq 3## only.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K