Solving Destructive Interference: Angle vs Wavelength

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the destructive interference equation for small angles, specifically angle = wavelength/(2a), where 'a' is the width. A user initially misapplied a double slit equation instead of the correct single slit equation, leading to a significant error in their wavelength calculation. After reviewing the relevant physics resource, they recognized the need to account for an additional factor of 2 and clarified their variables. By correctly applying the single slit equation, they recalculated the width and achieved a more accurate understanding of the interference patterns. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct equations in physics problems.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
angle=wavelength/(2a)
The destructive interference equation for small angles is angle=wavelength/(2a), where a is the width. I assume it means destructive interference since its talking about areas where no light is present.

Using the equation after changing degrees into radians I get the answer of 2491 nm when the answer shoould be 9982 nm. the answer is approx. 4 times as large. Where am I going wrong here?
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    7.3 KB · Views: 143
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
Hi,

Study http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/sinslit.html to find a factor of 2 (basically: you have the wrong relevant equation) and consider that the exercise text (were you not to be bothered retyping it ?) talks about the second angle to find another factor of 2 ...

##\ ##
i see, I was using a double slit eqn instead of a single slit. Looking at your link, tanx=x=y/D.

So i don't know what y is nor d.

d=y/x=y/0.108 = 9.2593y

Now I can use y=(m*wavelength*D)/a to find width. m i assume is 2 because second angle measurement...

0.108d=(2*539 nm *d)/a

a=9981.4815

This is good. Thanks. I have more understanding over slits now that *hopefully* I won't just haphazardly use an equation that seems appropriate.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU and berkeman
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top