Destructive interference through a narrow slit

  • Thread starter JoeyBob
  • Start date
  • #1
JoeyBob
256
29
Homework Statement:
See attached
Relevant Equations:
angle=wavelength/a
So I thought angle=wavelength/width of slit

But when I solve for the width I got the wrong answer of 4567 nm, when the answer is suppose to be 130881 nm. I figured out that I needed to multiply my incorrect answer by 28.7, but where does this constant come from? Its not part of the equation when there's constructive interference.
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    7.9 KB · Views: 56

Answers and Replies

  • #2
anuttarasammyak
Gold Member
1,929
1,007
It might be half of coefficient between degree and radian
[tex]360 / 2\pi = 57.29..[/tex]
 
  • #3
JoeyBob
256
29
It might be half of coefficient between degree and radian
[tex]360 / 2\pi = 57.29..[/tex]
How does that convert to multiplying wavelength/angle by 28.7?
 
  • #4
anuttarasammyak
Gold Member
1,929
1,007
This coincidence hinted me that you might have used angle value of degree not radian in the calculation. How did you do it?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
JoeyBob
256
29
This coincidence hinted me that you might have used angle value of degree not radian in the calculation. How did you do it?

Youre right, not used to seeing degrees so small. But when I convert it to radians I now have to divide the answer I get by 2 to get the right answer, why is that?

width = wavelength/angle = 540 nm /0.00209 radians, but this gives me an answer that needs to be divided by 2 to get the right answer.
 
  • #6
anuttarasammyak
Gold Member
1,929
1,007
For enhanced interference
[tex]d\sin\theta=\lambda[/tex]
For destructive interference
[tex]d\sin\theta=\frac{\lambda}{2}[/tex]
, a half of the former.
 

Suggested for: Destructive interference through a narrow slit

Replies
1
Views
367
Replies
8
Views
594
Replies
9
Views
473
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
459
Replies
10
Views
556
Replies
1
Views
621
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
483
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top