Destructive interference through a narrow slit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of destructive interference through a narrow slit, specifically focusing on the relationship between wavelength, slit width, and angle. Participants are examining the calculations involved in determining the width of the slit based on given parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the calculation of slit width using the formula angle = wavelength/width of slit. Questions arise regarding the discrepancy in the calculated width and the introduction of a constant factor in the calculations. There is also discussion about the potential confusion between degrees and radians in angle measurement.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into possible reasons for the incorrect calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of radians versus degrees, and the implications of using different units in the calculations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific numerical values and constants that are not part of the original equations, leading to questions about their origins. Participants are also addressing the need to adjust calculations based on the angle measurement used.

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
angle=wavelength/a
So I thought angle=wavelength/width of slit

But when I solve for the width I got the wrong answer of 4567 nm, when the answer is suppose to be 130881 nm. I figured out that I needed to multiply my incorrect answer by 28.7, but where does this constant come from? Its not part of the equation when there's constructive interference.
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    6.7 KB · Views: 164
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be half of coefficient between degree and radian
360 / 2\pi = 57.29..
 
anuttarasammyak said:
It might be half of coefficient between degree and radian
360 / 2\pi = 57.29..
How does that convert to multiplying wavelength/angle by 28.7?
 
This coincidence hinted me that you might have used angle value of degree not radian in the calculation. How did you do it?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob
anuttarasammyak said:
This coincidence hinted me that you might have used angle value of degree not radian in the calculation. How did you do it?

Youre right, not used to seeing degrees so small. But when I convert it to radians I now have to divide the answer I get by 2 to get the right answer, why is that?

width = wavelength/angle = 540 nm /0.00209 radians, but this gives me an answer that needs to be divided by 2 to get the right answer.
 
For enhanced interference
d\sin\theta=\lambda
For destructive interference
d\sin\theta=\frac{\lambda}{2}
, a half of the former.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K