Destructive interference through a narrow slit

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
angle=wavelength/a
So I thought angle=wavelength/width of slit

But when I solve for the width I got the wrong answer of 4567 nm, when the answer is suppose to be 130881 nm. I figured out that I needed to multiply my incorrect answer by 28.7, but where does this constant come from? Its not part of the equation when there's constructive interference.
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    6.7 KB · Views: 172
on Phys.org
It might be half of coefficient between degree and radian
[tex]360 / 2\pi = 57.29..[/tex]
 
anuttarasammyak said:
It might be half of coefficient between degree and radian
[tex]360 / 2\pi = 57.29..[/tex]
How does that convert to multiplying wavelength/angle by 28.7?
 
This coincidence hinted me that you might have used angle value of degree not radian in the calculation. How did you do it?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob
anuttarasammyak said:
This coincidence hinted me that you might have used angle value of degree not radian in the calculation. How did you do it?

Youre right, not used to seeing degrees so small. But when I convert it to radians I now have to divide the answer I get by 2 to get the right answer, why is that?

width = wavelength/angle = 540 nm /0.00209 radians, but this gives me an answer that needs to be divided by 2 to get the right answer.
 
For enhanced interference
[tex]d\sin\theta=\lambda[/tex]
For destructive interference
[tex]d\sin\theta=\frac{\lambda}{2}[/tex]
, a half of the former.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
603
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K