Solving Diophantine equation stuck, what do I do next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdnhldn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the Diophantine equation 61x + 37y = 2. The user successfully calculated the gcd(61, 37) as 1 using the Euclidean algorithm. They sought guidance on expressing this gcd as a linear combination of 61 and 37, which is essential for determining the solvability of the equation. The solution involves applying Bezout's identity, confirming that if a solution exists for the gcd, it can be scaled to find solutions for the original equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Diophantine equations
  • Familiarity with the Euclidean algorithm
  • Knowledge of Bezout's identity
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to express gcd as a linear combination using the Extended Euclidean Algorithm
  • Study the implications of Bezout's identity in solving linear Diophantine equations
  • Explore examples of solving specific Diophantine equations
  • Investigate the conditions for the solvability of Diophantine equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in solving linear Diophantine equations.

jdnhldn
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to determine if an diophantine equation is solveable or not. And got stuck at one point.

Homework Equations


61x+37y=2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the gcd(61,37)=1 by:

61/37=1 %24
37/24=1 %13
24/13=1 %11
13/11=1 %2
11/2=5 %1
2/1=2 %0

So gcd(61,37)=1

I know that I now should go backwards and express gcd(61,37) as a linear combination of61 and 37. But I don't understand it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdnhldn said:

Homework Statement


I am trying to determine if an diophantine equation is solveable or not. And got stuck at one point.

Homework Equations


61x+37y=2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the gcd(61,37)=1 by:

61/37=1 %24
37/24=1 %13
24/13=1 %11
13/11=1 %2
11/2=5 %1
2/1=2 %0

So gcd(61,37)=1

I know that I now should go backwards and express gcd(61,37) as a linear combination of61 and 37. But I don't understand it?

you should do like this, it maybe help to see

61 = (1)37 + 24
37 = (1)24 + 13
24 = (1)13 + 11
13 = (1)11 + 2
11 =(5)2 +1

so 1 = 11 - (5)2

you know 2 = 13 - (1)11 and 11 = 24 - (1)13 and similar to 13 and 24

just play with the numbers until you get the form 1 = (...)61 + (...)37
 
annoymage said:
you should do like this, it maybe help to see

61 = (1)37 + 24
37 = (1)24 + 13
24 = (1)13 + 11
13 = (1)11 + 2
11 =(5)2 +1

so 1 = 11 - (5)2

you know 2 = 13 - (1)11 and 11 = 24 - (1)13 and similar to 13 and 24

just play with the numbers until you get the form 1 = (...)61 + (...)37

Thank you, but is there a quick way to see if the equation is solvable or not? Or do I need to go all the way to find out?
 
jdnhldn said:
Thank you, but is there a quick way to see if the equation is solvable or not? Or do I need to go all the way to find out?

You can always solve ax + by = k \text{gcd}(a,b) (This is Bezout's identity and it is solved using the Euclidean algorithm).

Clearly if x',y' solves ax' + by' = \text{gcd}(a,b) then x = kx', y = ky' solves ax + by = k \text{gcd}(a,b), Thus you only have to work on ax' + by' = \text{gcd}(a,b), you can use the hint annoymage gives to prove this once and for all (as well as calculate x' and y' in specific cases where the numbers are given).
 
Thank you, I've got it. Now I saw the lights.
 
The "(n)" made me see it clearly. Thank you so much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K