Solving Double Slit Homework Qs: Phase Difference & Destructive Interference

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two antennas broadcasting radio waves and the analysis of phase differences and conditions for destructive interference. The context is rooted in wave physics, specifically dealing with interference patterns and path length differences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of phase differences and the conditions necessary for destructive interference. There is an exploration of how the path length difference changes as an observer moves closer to one of the antennas. Questions arise regarding the correct representation of distances and the implications of these distances on interference patterns.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on setting up equations related to path length differences and conditions for destructive interference. There is ongoing exploration of how to derive the necessary equations and solve for the distance at which destructive interference first occurs. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being considered, with participants actively questioning their assumptions and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the transition from initial calculations to solving for distances related to destructive interference. There are mentions of specific values and conditions that need to be met for the interference to occur, indicating a need for clarity on the underlying principles.

MartinFreeman
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two antennas located at points A and B are broadcasting radio waves of frequency 98.0 MHz, perfectly in phase with each other. The two antennas are separated by a distance d= 6.20 m. An observer, P, is located on the x axis, a distance x= 60.0 m from antenna A, so that APB forms a right triangle with PB as hypotenuse.

Homework Equations



phase difference / 2 pi = r2-r1 / lambda
d(y/L)= n(lamdba) if constructive
d(y/L) = (n+1/2)(lambda) if deconstructive.

The Attempt at a Solution



There are three questions, I have managed to solve the first one , which is :

What is the phase difference between the waves arriving at P from antennas A and B?

I have found, that the solution is : phase = (2(pi ) sqrt( (6.2)^2 + (60)^2) - 60) / 3.0612m - > 0.6557 rad.

the two following parts are where i become confused , I have searched online for advice, but I cannot seem to solve the following parts; here they are.

Now observer P walks along the x-axis toward antenna A. What is P's distance from A when he first observes fully destructive interference between the two waves?

and finally, the third part :

If observer P continues walking until he reaches antenna A, at how many places along the x-axis (including the place you found in the previous problem) will he detect minima in the radio signal, due to destructive interference?note: If you do help, I very much appreciate it! However, If you could be as clear as possible. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MartinFreeman said:
I have found, that the solution is : phase = (2(pi ) sqrt( (6.2)^2 + (60)^2) - 60) / 3.0612m - > 0.6557 rad.
Do you understand this solution? The same thinking is used for all parts of the problem.
MartinFreeman said:
the two following parts are where i become confused , I have searched online for advice, but I cannot seem to solve the following parts; here they are.

Now observer P walks along the x-axis toward antenna A. What is P's distance from A when he first observes fully destructive interference between the two waves?
Ask yourself: What's the path length difference between AP and BP? What is the value at the initial point? How many wavelengths is that? As the distance AP decreases, what must the path length difference equal to have destructive interference? (Represent the distance AP as "x" in your equations, since you'll be solving for it.)
 
thanks for responding Doc, however I must admit that I am still no further in understanding how to get to the first destructive point.
Going from your quick series of questions , this is what I have come up with ( and I have a feeling I've made a mistake )

The path length between AP and BP is sqrt(6.2^2 +60^2) - 60 = 0.319482m

how many wavelengths is that? 0.319482m/3.0612m = 0.104 of a lamda, (10.4%) ( this i become uncertain of what to do )

AP must decrease such that the pathlength between AP and BP should cause BP's wavelength to be out of phase, which is pi / 180 degrees (?)

so... ( this is a guess ) BP-AP must = 1/2 lamda (?) such that there would be a destructive point,

is AP = 60-x and BP = to sqrt( (6.2^2)+ (X^2)) ? I don't know what to do I'm sorry.
~ AP= X
~ X = 60 - x
 
You're on the right track. Yes, the path length difference must equal λ/2. Call the distance AP = x. Now write a general expression for the path length difference in terms of x. (I think you've almost got it.) Then set it equal to λ/2 and solve for x. (It will be a quadratic equation.)
 
Doc Al said:
You're on the right track. Yes, the path length difference must equal λ/2. Call the distance AP = x. Now write a general expression for the path length difference in terms of x. (I think you've almost got it.) Then set it equal to λ/2 and solve for x. (It will be a quadratic equation.)
thanks again for responding, I am not to sure how I'm getting a quadratic,

The relationship I've come up with is this , r2-r1 = lamda /2
r2= BP = sqrt( 6.2^2 +x^2)
r1 = AP = x

path difference = 3.06/2
~sqrt ( 6.2^2 =x^2) = 3.06/ 2
~38.44 +x^2 - 3600 = (3.06/2)^2
x^2 = 3563.9
x = + 59.69

I've spent a few hours on this question and I think I'm losing my mind on this. Do you mind sharing the solution with me? Thanks a lot for your patience and help!
 
MartinFreeman said:
The relationship I've come up with is this , r2-r1 = lamda /2
r2= BP = sqrt( 6.2^2 +x^2)
r1 = AP = x
Good.
MartinFreeman said:
path difference = 3.06/2
Good.
MartinFreeman said:
~sqrt ( 6.2^2 =x^2) = 3.06/ 2
What happened to r1? (The approximation is not justified.)
 
Doc Al said:
Good.

Good.

What happened to r1? (The approximation is not justified.)

is it possibly, sqrt( 6.2^2 + x^2) - x = 1.53m? now I'm stuck for sure.
 
MartinFreeman said:
is it possibly, sqrt( 6.2^2 + x^2) - x = 1.53m? now I'm stuck for sure.
Solve for x.
 
Doc Al said:
Solve for x.
X cancels itself though ,

38.44 +x^2 - x^2 = 2.3409m
38.44= 2.3409 . .
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
Solve for x.
Sorry for wasting your time , Il just skip it
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Solve for x.
Can i simply ask you how to arrange the equation?
 
  • #12
MartinFreeman said:
X cancels itself though ,
No it doesn't.
Do this:
sqrt( 6.2^2 + x^2) - x = 1.53
sqrt( 6.2^2 + x^2) = 1.53 + x

Now square both sides to get rid of that square root.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MartinFreeman
  • #13
Doc Al said:
No it doesn't.
Do this:
sqrt( 6.2^2 + x^2) - x = 1.53
sqrt( 6.2^2 + x^2) = 1.53 + x

Now square both sides to get rid of that square root.

Thank you very much for helping me Doc I've managed to get the solution
 
  • #14
MartinFreeman said:
Thank you very much for helping me Doc I've managed to get the solution
:thumbup:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
902