MHB Solving Equation: x = sqrt(3x + x^2 - 3sqrt(3x + x^2))

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation x = sqrt(3x + x^2 - 3sqrt(3x + x^2) is solved by first squaring both sides, leading to x^2 = 3x + x^2 - 3sqrt(3x + x^2). Simplifying this results in -3x = -3sqrt(3x + x^2), which further simplifies to x = sqrt(3x + x^2). Squaring again gives x^2 = 3x + x^2, leading to the conclusion that 0 = 3x. The only real solution is x = 0, confirming the correctness of the solution process.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find all real solutions of the equation.

$x = \sqrt{3x + x^2 - 3\sqrt{3x + x^2}}$

Must I square each side twice to start?

$(x)^2 = [\sqrt{3x + x^2 - 3\sqrt{3x + x^2}}]^2$

$x^2 = 3x + x^2 - 3\sqrt{3x + x^2}$

$x^2 - x^2 - 3x = -3\sqrt{3x + x^2}$

$-3x = -3\sqrt{3x + x^2}$

$x = \sqrt{3x + x^2}$

$(x)^2 = [\sqrt{3x + x^2}]^2$

$x^2 = 3x + x^2$

$x^2 - x^2 = 3x$

$0 = 3x$

$0/3 = x$

$0 = x$

Is this right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's correct.
 
Good to know that I am right.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top