Solving for C1 and C2: A Wave Function Boundary Condition

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a one-dimensional wave function associated with a localized particle, specifically focusing on determining constants C1 and C2 to satisfy the boundary condition of continuity at x = 4.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the boundary condition requiring both parts of the wave function to equal at x = 4. There is an exploration of whether the proposed values for C1 and C2 are unique or if other solutions exist. Questions arise regarding the implications of the first derivative of the wave function and its continuity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining the relationship between C1 and C2 and questioning the uniqueness of the solution. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for additional equations to determine the constants uniquely, as well as the importance of the first derivative's continuity.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the potential for multiple solutions and the need to review boundary conditions related to wave functions in quantum mechanics. The discussion also touches on the nature of the constants, questioning whether they must be integers.

zhillyz
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A one-dimensional wave function associated with a localized particle can be written as

[itex]\varphi (x) = \begin{cases}<br /> 1- \frac{x^2}{8}, & \text{if } 0<x<4, \\<br /> C_1 - \frac{C_2}{x^2}, & \text{if} \,x \geq 4.<br /> \end{cases}[/itex]

Determine [itex]C_1[/itex] and [itex]C_2[/itex] for which this wave function will obey the boundary condition of continuity at x = 4.

Homework Equations



N\A

The Attempt at a Solution



So I am thinking the boundary condition is to make sure both equations hold at x = 4, and fed into the first equation it equals -1 so equate the second to -1 also and find values for [itex]C_1 \text{and} C_2[/itex] which would be 1 and 32 respectively? Is this correct because the question is worth 6marks which seems like a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Is [itex]C_1=1[/itex] and [itex]C_2=32[/itex] the only solution to [itex]-1=C_1-\frac{C_2}{16}[/itex]?

You have two unknowns and one equation, so if you want a unique solution you will need one more independent equation for [itex]C_1[/itex] and [itex]C_2[/itex]. What can you say about [itex]\varphi'(x)[/itex]?
 


[itex]16C_1+16 = C_2[/itex] So for values of C_1 = 1,2,3,4 C_2 will = 32,48,64,80 respectively.

or

[itex]C_2(n) = C_2(n-1) +16[/itex]

The first order differential of [itex]\varphi[/itex]? Em that it would be part of the shrodinger equation?
 


zhillyz said:
[itex]16C_1+16 = C_2[/itex] So for values of C_1 = 1,2,3,4 C_2 will = 32,48,64,80 respectively.

or

[itex]C_2(n) = C_2(n-1) +16[/itex]

Who says that the constants have to be integers? There are an infinite number of solutions.

The first order differential of [itex]\varphi[/itex]? Em that it would be part of the shrodinger equation?

You need to review your notes/textbook on the boundary conditions of the wavefunction. For a finite potential/barrier, the first derivative of the wavefunction must be continuous.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K