Solving for ΔP: Should I Include ΔVΔI?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyouran
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inclusion of the term ΔVΔI when calculating the change in power (ΔP) in the equation P_0 + ΔP = V_0 I_0 + V_0 ΔI + I_0 ΔV. The consensus is that the term ΔVΔI can be disregarded as it approaches zero in the limit, aligning with the differential form dP/dt = V_0 dI/dt + I_0 dV/dt. This indicates that only first-order variations are necessary for accurate calculations in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical power equations (P = VI)
  • Familiarity with differential calculus and limits
  • Knowledge of first-order and higher-order variations
  • Basic concepts of current (I) and voltage (V) in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of higher-order terms in Taylor series expansions
  • Learn about the applications of differential calculus in electrical engineering
  • Explore the concept of limits and their role in calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between power, voltage, and current in AC circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in power calculations and circuit analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Kyouran
Messages
70
Reaction score
10
Hey all,

I have a question that's been annoying me for a little while:

if i have

[tex] P_0 = V_0 I_0[/tex]

(power equals current times the potential difference) then is

[tex] P_0 + \Delta P= V_0 I_0 + V_0 \Delta I + I_0 \Delta V + \Delta V \Delta I[/tex]

correct or should it be

[tex] P_0 + \Delta P= V_0 I_0 + V_0 \Delta I + I_0 \Delta V[/tex]

In other words, if I use ΔP should I include the term ΔVΔI or not? After all, when I use differentials, i get

[tex] \frac{dP}{dt} = V_0 \frac{dI}{dt} + I_0 \frac{dV}{dt}[/tex]

But when I look at what is meant by "ΔP", it is stated as "the change in delta P", which includes more terms than just the first order ones? What is exactly meant by Δ? Just the first order variation, or all orders of variations?

Thanks in advance,


Kyouran
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The product of the two differences can be taken to zero as we approach the limit to 0, so you do regain the usual differential P+dP=IV+IdV+VdI
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K