Doubt about variable mass systems

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the complexities of variable mass systems, particularly in relation to Halliday's derivation of force equations. The participants analyze the implications of mass loss and velocity changes, specifically questioning the validity of using the formula \( F_{est} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + v \frac{dM}{dt} - u \frac{dM}{dt} \). Key points include the confusion surrounding the treatment of mass changes and the velocity of the center of mass, with references to external threads that highlight differing interpretations and derivations, including those by Taylor. The consensus indicates that the notation \( M - \Delta M \) can lead to misunderstandings regarding mass changes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law as applied to variable mass systems
  • Familiarity with momentum conservation principles
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives and limits
  • Experience with classical mechanics textbooks, such as Halliday and Resnick
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the rocket equation in variable mass systems
  • Learn about the implications of mass loss on momentum and force calculations
  • Examine the treatment of variable mass systems in classical mechanics literature
  • Investigate the differences between lab frame and relative velocity in momentum equations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and professionals in mechanics, particularly those focusing on variable mass systems and their applications in real-world scenarios such as rocket propulsion.

  • #31
Hak said:
OK, thanks. Were you able to see the posts in the thread I referred you to in post #26?
The OP in that thread is guilty of setting up the reader for confusion.
First the OP says "The rocket now has velocity v+dv and mass M+dM, where the change in mass dM is a negative quantity.". That's fine.
Then the OP says "If I'm allowed to change M+dM with M-dM and -dM with dM then Eq. 9-38 becomes
M * v = dM * U + (M - dM) * (v + dv)"
Equation 9.38 is
M * v = -dM * U + (M + dM) * (v + dv) ... (9-38)

Well, having defined dM as a negative quantity, one is not allowed to change dM to -dM but to -|dM| to avoid conflict with the definition plus confusion about the variables. Then Eq. 9-38 should be
M * v = |dM| * U + (M - |dM|) * (v + dv) ... (9-38a)
OP writes the equation
M * v = dM * U + (M - dM) * (v + dv) ... (9.38b)

Do you see the difference between equations (9.38a) and (9.38b)? They are the same but only if dM in (9.39b) is defined as a positive quantity which is in direct contradiction to its original definition. Is that what confused you?

The equation $$m~\frac{dv}{dt}=(u-v)\frac{dm}{dt}$$ gets around the issue whether ##dm## is positive or negative. The mass transfer to or from the system of interest 1 (e.g the rocket) and the secondary system 2 (e.g. the fuel) is such that ##dm_1+dm_2=0.## Study the derivation in the insight. Which one is positive and which one is negative is irrelevant. In the equation ##m## and ##dm## are ##m_1## and ##dm_1## with the subscripts dropped as explained in the derivation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hak

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K