Solving for Energy & Momentum in Physics Questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving physics questions related to energy and momentum, specifically regarding the longest wavelength for resolving points and the kinetic energy of an electron. The initial answer of 0.5 A is deemed reasonable but could benefit from clarification. The confusion arises from the distinction between photon energy and electron kinetic energy, emphasizing that the latter should relate to the electron's deBroglie wavelength. Participants suggest deriving a formula for the electron's kinetic energy based on its mass and wavelength, while also noting that the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is not relevant to the measurement problem at hand.
anto
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
1)for an object of size 0.5 Angstrom, what is the longest-wavelength photon with which it can be observed?
2)for the object of problem 1, what is the smallest-energy electron which can be used to make the measurement?
Relevant Equations
∆E∆t = h/4(phi)
∆p∆x = h/4(phi)
∆λ = (∆E/E)λ
for the first question, i thougth that 0,5 A is the answer?

for the second question:
i used the E =hc/λ to found the E. but i got a little confused which equations to find ∆E, since there's no ∆t. or should i search the momentum, then use the λ= h/p ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your title "Uncertainty principle -- Using photons vs. electrons to observe a very small object" is confusing since the HUP has absolutely nothing to do with how things are observed. That is, the HUP is in no way a measurement problem, it is a feature of reality.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and weirdoguy
anto said:
for the second question:
i used the E =hc/λ to found the E. but i got a little confused which equations to find ∆E, since there's no ∆t. or should i search the momentum, then use the λ= h/p ?
Hi @anto. Welcome to PF.

As already noted by @phinds, the question has nothing to do with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. It’s about applying the diffraction limit of ‘classical optics’.

Your answer to the first part is reasonable. You might want to add ‘the order of‘ or ‘approximately’ to your value. If you wanted a more precise value, you could use what is called the Abbe limit (e.g. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction-limited_system#The_Abbe_diffraction_limit_for_a_microscope).

But the questions seems badly worded, I think the real questions are these:

Q1. What is the longest wavelength [of any type of wave] which can be used to resolve points separated by 0.5 Angstrom?

Q2 What is the smallest kinetic energy of an electron which can be used to achieve this resolution?
________________
You have answered Q1. For Q2, note that E = hc/λ is for photon energy, not the kinetic energy of an electron.

Q2 asks for the electron’s kinetic energy which makes the electron’s deBroglie wavelength equal to 0.5 Angstrom (or whatever your answer to Q1 is).

Can you work out a formula for the electron’s kinetic energy (E) in terms of it mass (m), its deBroglie wavelength (λ) and Planck’s constant (h)?

Edit - typo' corrected.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top