Solving for Kcm in Particle Collision Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle with mass 'm' and kinetic energy 'K' colliding with a stationary particle of mass 'M', with the goal of finding the total kinetic energy in the center of mass system 'Kcm'. The discussion centers around the assumptions regarding the type of collision and the application of conservation laws.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of conservation of momentum and energy equations, questioning the assumption that both particles move together post-collision. Some suggest that the collision type (elastic vs inelastic) significantly affects the outcome.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the nature of the collision and its implications on kinetic energy calculations. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, emphasizing the need to clarify assumptions about the collision type.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of explicit information regarding the type of collision, which is crucial for solving the problem. Participants note that without assuming an inelastic collision, the problem may not be solvable as stated.

AntiStrange
Messages
18
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A particle with mass 'm' and kinetic energy 'K' collides with a stationary particle of mass M. Then it says to find the total kinetic energy in the center of mass system 'Kcm'.
The answer is:
K_{cm} = \frac{M}{M + m}K


Homework Equations


conservation of momentum: total initial momentum = total final momentum
KE = (1/2)mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using conservation of momentum:
m(v_{1}) = (m + M)v_{2}
where v1 is the velocity of the particle with mass 'm' and v2 is the velocity after the collision of both particles moving together (assuming this happens).

Then I just solved for v2 and tried to find the kinetic energy now which I assumed would be Kcm:
K_{cm} = \frac{m}{2(m + M)}K
which looks pretty close except it's supposed to be a M on top, not a m, and there is no 2 in the denominator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your attempted solution assumes that both bodies move with the same speed after the collision. That will not generally be the case. You will need to use both the momentum and energy equations in the lab frame, find the motion of the CM in the lab frame, then transform to the CM frame and calculate the energies there.
 
@AntiStrange : I have calculated the equation, and I find the my answer is the same as the answer key assuming that the collision is inelastic ( tow particles moving together ). My hypothesis is that you made a mathematics mistake ( equation mistake ) .

@tms : We can't do this question without assuming that it's an inelastic collision. Because if it's an elastic collision, the Kcm must be the same as K ( no energy is gone )
 
prob_solv said:
@AntiStrange : I have calculated the equation, and I find the my answer is the same as the answer key assuming that the collision is inelastic ( tow particles moving together ). My hypothesis is that you made a mathematics mistake ( equation mistake ) .

@tms : We can't do this question without assuming that it's an inelastic collision. Because if it's an elastic collision, the Kcm must be the same as K ( no energy is gone )

The problem says nothing about calculating the energy after the collision. Just calculate the kinetic energy of the center of mass before the collision starting from

K_{CM}=\frac{1}{2}(M+m)V^{2}_{CM}

and expressing the VCM in terms of K.

After the collision, if the collision is elastic, the CM energy will be the same. If the collision is perfectly inelastic, the CM energy will be zero.
 
prob_solv said:
@tms : We can't do this question without assuming that it's an inelastic collision. Because if it's an elastic collision, the Kcm must be the same as K ( no energy is gone )

First, if the collision is inelastic, there is no way of telling, from the information given, how much energy is lost, so the problem can't be solved.

Second, kinetic energy is not an invariant under the Galilean transformation. Just consider two different masses, and look at the kinetic energy in the two frames in which one or the other mass is at rest.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
826
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K