Solving for Optimal Advertising Units in Managerial Economics

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HighAllegiant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Economics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing advertising units in managerial economics using regression analysis. The sales function is defined as S(x, y) = 100 – x² + 30x – y² + 40y. The optimal advertising levels were determined to be X* = 15 and Y* = 20 for maximum sales without constraints. When constrained by a budget of 31 units, the optimal advertising levels were found to be X* = 13 and Y* = 18, achieved by substituting the budget constraint into the sales function and applying standard calculus techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of regression analysis in economics
  • Familiarity with the Lagrangian method for optimization
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation and maximization techniques
  • Basic concepts of budget constraints in economic models
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Lagrangian method in constrained optimization problems
  • Learn about regression analysis techniques in managerial economics
  • Explore advanced calculus techniques for optimization
  • Research economic interpretations of Lagrangian multipliers
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in economics, particularly those focusing on managerial decision-making, optimization techniques, and advertising effectiveness.

HighAllegiant
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Managerial Economics Problem

SOLVED

A firm has decided through regression analysis that its sales (S) are a function of the amount of advertising (measured in units) in two different media, television (x) and magazines (y):

S(x, y) = 100 – x
2 + 30x – y2 + 40y

(a) Find the level of TV and magazine advertising units that maximizes the firm's sales.
(b) Suppose that the advertising budget is restricted to 31 units. Determine the level of advertising (in units) that maximizes sales subject to this budget constraint.
(c) Give an economic interpretation for the value of the Lagrangian Multiplier obtained in part (b) above.

I already solved (a) by finding the derivative with respect to (x,y) and equating to 0.
(a) X* = 15, Y* = 20

My prof provided the answer to (b) and I have absolutely no idea to how he arrived at it.
I assumed the the Income(M)=31 but without any given prices for (x,y), I cannot seem to apply it into a Lagrangian method.
(I'm assuming I use the Lagrangian method because it was the most recent lecture to this question. (c) also asks a follow up question which requires the Langrangian multiplier.)
Could anyone help me?

(b) X* = 13, Y* = 18
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try $x+y=31$, and plug this into your sales function, thus reducing it to a function of a single variable. The bounds on $x$, say, are $x\in[0,31]$. Use the standard Calculus I technique for maximization.
 
Thanks.
I just realized that I had been so used to my instructor's problems where he provides the prices for each product that I had no idea what to do when he doesn't give any prices.
(It works on problems which are similar to the one I just asked for.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K