Solving for simultaneous equations

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simultaneous equations
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a set of simultaneous equations involving three variables, specifically proving the non-existence of real solutions and calculating the value of a fourth power expression based on the given equations. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of algebraic identities.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the simultaneous equations defined by \(a+b+c=1\), \(a^2+b^2+c^2=2\), and \(a^3+b^3+c^3=3\) have no real solutions, suggesting a cubic equation derived from these conditions.
  • Another participant provides a solution for part (i), indicating that the cubic equation has one real root in the interval \((1,2)\) and that the roots for \(b\) become complex under certain conditions.
  • A different participant approaches part (ii) by utilizing an auxiliary equation to derive a recursion relation, leading to the calculation of \(a^4+b^4+c^4\) as \(\frac{25}{6}\).
  • Another contributor mentions using Newton's identities to derive similar results, confirming the cubic equation's properties and the non-existence of all real roots.
  • One participant validates the non-existence of real solutions by showing that a derived expression for \(a^2b^2+b^2c^2+c^2a^2\) is negative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the simultaneous equations do not have real solutions, as indicated by multiple approaches leading to the same conclusion. However, the discussion includes various methods and reasoning, indicating a lack of consensus on the most elegant or straightforward solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on various mathematical techniques, including cubic equations and identities, which may depend on specific assumptions or definitions that are not fully articulated. The discussion does not resolve all potential mathematical steps or implications of the derived results.

Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
( i ) prove the following simultaneous equations (1) (2) and (3) has no real solution

$a+b+c=1-----(1)$

$a^2+b^2+c^2=2----(2)$

$a^3+b^3+c^3=3----(3)$

( ii ) using (1)(2)and(3)find the value of :

$a^4+b^4+c^4$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: solving for simultaneous equations

Here's my solution to part (i). Not really the most elegant but gets it done. Solving eqn (1) for $c$ and substituting into the remaining two equations gives (with appropriate scaling)

$b^2 +(a-1)b +a^2-a-\dfrac{1}{2} = 0$

$(a-1)b^2+(a-1)^2b-a^2+a+\dfrac{2}{3}=0$

Eliminating $b$ between these two gives that $a$ satisfies the cubic

$6a^3-6a^2-3a-1 = 0$

Via a variety of techniques we can show that this cubic has only one real root and it's lies in the interval $(1,2)$ so $a > 1$.

Next we will show that the first equation for $b$ has complex roots for this value of $a$. To show this is to show that

$(a-1)^2 - 4(a^2-a-\dfrac{1}{2}) < 0$ or $-3a^2+2a+3 < 0$

As $a$ satisfies this cubic then

$-3a^2+2a+\dfrac{3}{2} = - \dfrac{1}{2a} - a + \dfrac{3}{2} < 0$ if $a > 1.$

The latter part can be established as follows: Let $f(a) =- \dfrac{1}{2a} - a + \dfrac{3}{2} $. Since $f(1) = 0$ and $f'(a) <0$ if $a>1$ then $f(a) < 0$ for $a>1$.
 
Re: solving for simultaneous equations

I'll take a stab at part (ii):

From the form of the given expressions, we may use an auxiliary equation of:

[math](r-a)(r-b)(r-c)=r^3-(a+b+c)r^2+(ab+ac+bc)r-abc=0[/math]

to determine the linear homogeneous recursion:

[math]S_{n+3}=(a+b+c)S_{n+2}-(ab+ac+bc)S_{n+1}+abcS_{n}[/math]

where we are given:

[math]S_1=1,\,S_2=2,\,S_3=3[/math]

If we square (1), we find:

$$(a^2+b^2+c^2)+2(ab+ac+bc)=1$$

Using (2), this becomes:

$$2+2(ab+ac+bc)=1$$

Hence:

$$ab+ac+bc=-\frac{1}{2}$$

If we cube (1), we find:

$$(a^3+b^3+c^3)+3(a+b+c)(ab+ac+bc)-3abc=1$$

Using (3) and our previous result, this becomes:

$$3-\frac{3}{2}-3abc=1$$

Hence:

$$abc=\frac{1}{6}$$

And so our recursion becomes:

[math]S_{n+3}=S_{n+2}+\frac{1}{2}S_{n+1}+\frac{1}{6}S_{n}[/math]

With $n=1$, we then find:

$$a^4+b^4+c^4=S_4=3+\frac{1}{2}\cdot2+\frac{1}{6} \cdot1=\frac{25}{6}$$
 
Last edited:
For me, this is an ideal opportunity to use Newton's identities.

Let $x^3- px^2 +qx - r = 0$ be the equation whose roots are $a,\ b,\ c$, and let $S_k = a^k+b^k+c^k \ (k=1,2,3,4)$. Newton's identities say that
$\phantom{1}p = S_1 = 1$,
$2q = pS_1 - S_2 = 1-2 = -1$,
$3r = qS_1 - pS_2 + S_3 = -\frac12 -2 +3 = \frac12$,
$\phantom{1}0 = rS_1 - qS_2 + pS_3 - S_4$.​

Thus $p=1$, $q = -\frac12$, $r = \frac16$, and the cubic equation is $x^3 - x^2 - \frac12x - \frac16 = 0$. That is the same equation that Jester found for $a$, and as he pointed out it only has one real root. So $a,\ b,\ c$ cannot all be real.

Finally the last of those Newton's identities above shows that $S_4 = \frac16 + 1+ 3 = \frac{25}6$.
 
( i )using the result from MarkFL :

$a+b+c=1,\,\,ab+bc+ca=\dfrac {-1}{2},\,\, abc=\dfrac {1}{6}$

$(ab+bc+ca)^2=a^2b^2+b^2c^2+c^2a^2+2abc(a+b+c)=$$ \dfrac {1}{4}$

$\therefore a^2b^2+b^2c^2+c^2a^2=$$ \dfrac {1}{4} - 2abc(a+b+c)=\dfrac {1}{4} - \dfrac {1}{3}=\dfrac {-1}{12}<0$

This proves the first part :the simultaneous equationsno has no real solution

( ii )

$(2)^2:$$(a^2+b^2+c^2)^2=a^4+b^4+c^4+2(a^2b^2+b^2c^2+c^2a^2)=4$$\therefore a^4+b^4+c^4=4-2\times(\dfrac {-1}{12})=\dfrac {25}{6}$ #
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
883
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K