Solving for the Speed of a Comet in an Elliptical Orbit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a comet in an elliptical orbit at different distances from the sun. The initial speed is given as 2.3×10^4 m/s at a distance of 2.7×10^11 m, and the challenge is to find the speed at 4.3×10^10 m. Various methods were attempted, including conservation of angular momentum and energy, but the user struggled to arrive at the correct answer. The vis-viva equation was suggested as a valid approach, emphasizing that energy conservation principles are key to solving the problem. Concerns were raised about the initial distance and speed values, suggesting a possible error in the provided data.
ccsmarty
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Comets travel around the sun in elliptical orbits with large eccentricities. If a comet has speed 2.3×10^4 m/s when at a distance of 2.7×10^11 m from the center of the sun, what is its speed when at a distance of 4.3×10^10 m.


Homework Equations



I tried using v = ((G*M) / r) ^ 0.5, but I'm not sure if that will work with this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution



* I tried using conservation of angular momentum (per a tutor's advice), but didn't get the right answer
* I tried using Kepler's 2nd Law (area sweep) because the area that is swept out is the same all around the circle, but again no luck
* I tried using conservation of energy
* I used the equation that I listed above and solved for the mass of the comet by plugging in the 1st velocity and radius. Then I used the mass I came up with, along with the 2nd radius and solved for the velocity (v = 5.8*10^4 m/s). I inputted this answer into my online homework site, and it said that I was close, but not right.

Can someone please help me figure out where I went wrong??
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ccsmarty said:
I tried using v = ((G*M) / r) ^ 0.5, but I'm not sure if that will work with this problem.

This is the circular velocity for an orbit of radius r, so this pretty definitely won't work for the elliptical orbit of a comet.

I tried using conservation of energy...

This is the only approach that will help you. How did you use it? What is the energy that is conserved as the comet travels on its orbit?
 
This is what I did with the energy methods:

cometproblem2.jpg


But this answer is wrong.
 
Last edited:
The calculation appears to be all right for the numbers given. The speed of the comet increases by a modest factor of about three for having gotten about six times closer to the Sun.

But I can't help wondering if the distances are given correctly. The comet is said to start at a distance of 2.7·10^11 m , which is only about 1.8 AU, with a speed of 23 km/sec. (The final distance of 4.3·10^10 m is about 0.29 AU, which is credible for a perihelion distance.) That initial speed seems suspiciously low for that distance on a cometary orbit. Might the starting distance be more like 18 AU?
 
ccsmarty said:
7.6*104m/s
But this answer is wrong.

The vis-viva equation yields the same answer (not surprising, since the vis-viva equation follows directly from conservation of energy.) What makes you think the answer is wrong?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
840
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top