Solving for Velocity of a Body with Fx=-6xN

  • Thread starter Thread starter themanofosu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a 2.9 kg body under the influence of a force defined by Fx = -6x N. The initial velocity at x = 3.0 m is given as 8.0 m/s. Participants explore the relationship between work and kinetic energy to determine the velocity at x = 4.0 m and the position where the velocity equals 5.0 m/s. The hint provided emphasizes the importance of understanding work done by a spring force and the spring constant, which is identified as K = 6.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy calculations
  • Basic grasp of spring force mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about spring force and Hooke's Law
  • Explore kinetic energy formulas and their applications
  • Practice solving problems involving forces and motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics, particularly in the context of forces and motion analysis.

themanofosu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

The only force acting on a 2.9 kg body as it moves along the positive x-axis has an x component Fx = - 6x N, where x is in meters. The velocity of the body at x = 3.0 m is 8.0 m/s.

a)What is the velocity of the body at x = 4.0 m?

and

b) At what positive value of x will the body have a velocity of 5.0 m/s?

It does provide a hint : "Work is equal to the change in the kinetic energy. How does work by a spring force depend on the position? What is the value of the spring constant here?"

So I am thinking that K= 6. And that work of the spring = (1/2)(k)(x_initial)^2 - (1/2)(k)(x_final)^2, and we can plug that in for work = (1/2)(m)(v_final)^2 - (1/2) (m)(v_inital)^2 to find the velocity when x = 4. so where did I go wrong here, how do i properly solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi themanofosu! :smile:

Your method looks correct.

But (as with your other thread) it will help in future if you actually show you full calculations …

most members posting about wrong answers turn out to have made a simple arithmetic error. :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K