Solving for ##x## for a given inequality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the inequality ##\dfrac{x}{x+2}\le \dfrac{1}{|x|}##, identifying critical points where ##x \ne 0, -2##. The analysis leads to two cases: the first case yields solutions of ##-2 PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of inequalities and absolute values in algebra.
  • Familiarity with quadratic equations and their properties.
  • Knowledge of number line analysis for interval solutions.
  • Ability to manipulate rational expressions and perform algebraic simplifications.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of absolute value inequalities in detail.
  • Learn about quadratic inequalities and their graphical interpretations.
  • Explore methods for solving rational inequalities, including sign analysis.
  • Review the concept of combining solution sets from multiple cases in inequalities.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in algebra, particularly those focusing on inequalities and rational expressions, as well as anyone preparing for standardized tests involving algebraic problem-solving.

brotherbobby
Messages
756
Reaction score
170
Homework Statement
Solve : ##\mathbf{\dfrac{x}{x+2}\le \dfrac{1}{|x|}}##
Relevant Equations
(1) By definition, ##|x| = x## if ##x\ge 0## and ##|x| = -x## if ##x \le 0##.
(2) ##\frac{1}{x}## is not defined for ##x = 0##.
(3) If ##|x| > a\Rightarrow x>a\; \text{or}\; x<-a##
1656848675312.png
Problem Statement :
I copy and paste the problem from the text to the right.

Attempt (mine) : Given the inequality ##\dfrac{x}{x+2}\le \dfrac{1}{|x|}##. We see immediately that ##x\ne 0, -2##. At the same time, since ##|x|\ge 0\Rightarrow \frac{x}{x+2}\ge 0##.

Now if ##\frac{x}{x+2}\le \frac{1}{|x|}\Rightarrow \frac{1}{|x|}\ge \frac{x}{x+2}##, then we have either ##\frac{1}{x}\ge \frac{x}{x+2}## or ##\frac{1}{x}\le -\frac{x}{x+2}##.

1. The first inequality above reduces to ##\frac{1}{x}-\frac{x}{x+2}\ge 0\Rightarrow \frac{x+2-x^2}{x(x+2)}\ge 0\Rightarrow \frac{x^2-x-2}{x(x+2)}\le 0\Rightarrow \frac{(x-2)(x+1)}{x(x+2)}\le 0## which lead to the answers : ##\boxed{-2<x<-1\; \text{OR}\; 0<x<2}## (note the equality condition is forbidden due to considerations right at the beginning). This can be found by the number line
1656849968462.png
pneumonic shown to the right or any other way you are used to with inequalities.

I attach the pictorial pneumonic to the right for those who are used to it. 2. The second inquality above reduces to ##\frac{1}{x}+\frac{x}{x+2}\le 0\Rightarrow \frac{x^2+x+2}{x(x+2}\le 0##. Now we can show using the method of "squaring a quadratic equation" that the numerator ##x^2+x+2>0 \;\;\forall x##. Thus focus falls on the numerator, which yields ##\boxed{-2<x<0}##.

Putting both cases 1 and 2 together and caring for overlaps, my solution for the proble reads : ##\boxed{-2<x<-1\;\;\;\text{OR}\;\;\; 0<x<2}## .

Solution (Text) : I could neither follow, nor agree, with the solution in the text. I copy and paste it below.
1656850738316.png


I have underlined what I believe to be the solutions. So ##x=0?!##. Clearly that is not correct. However, the text is right when I take samples from its solutions that are less than zero, for instance ##x = -1, -0.5## etc., solutions which I did not get. Surely my method is mistaken.

A hint or suggestion would be welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your case 1 is when ##x>0## thus the solution ##-2<x<-1## must be disregarded as out of the allowed limit (which is ##x>0##).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
In addition to @Delta2's point, you have combined your two 'ORed' cases incorrectly. You should have included all of the -2<x<0 results of the second case.
 
brotherbobby said:
I attach the pictorial pneumonic
"Pneumonic" isn't the word you want here. That would be "mnemonic."
 
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K