MHB Solving for x in $\frac{6x}{150}$ - $\frac{5x}{150}$ = 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation $\frac{6x}{150} - \frac{5x}{150} = 1$ simplifies to $\frac{x}{150} = 1$, leading to the solution $x = 150$. To find a common denominator, the least common multiple of 25 and 30 is determined to be 150. By multiplying the equation by 150, the terms simplify, confirming that $x$ equals 150. The discussion concludes with agreement on the correctness of the solution.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
$\frac{x}{25}$ - $\frac{x}{30}$ = 1 (Happy)

Okay, I see that they can come to a common denominator of,

$\frac{6x}{150}$ - $\frac{5x}{150}$ = 1 , Now to find x; (Happy)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by finding the LCM of 25 and 30. To do that, consider the prime factorizations:

$$25=5^2$$

$$30=2\cdot3\cdot5$$

Therefore:

$$\text{lcm}(25,30)=2\cdot3\cdot5^2=150$$

So, if we multiply the equation by 150, we obtain:

$$6x-5x=150$$

$$x=150$$

Does that make sense?
 
After getting into common denominator and subtracting,

$\frac{x}{150}$ =1

$\frac{x}{150}*150 =1*150 $

$ x = 150$ , Correct ? (Thinking)
 

Attachments

  • Capmbture.PNG
    Capmbture.PNG
    1.8 KB · Views: 80
Last edited:
mathlearn said:
$\frac{x}{25}$ - $\frac{x}{30}$ = 1 (Happy)

Okay, I see that they can come to a common denominator of,

$\frac{6x}{150}$ - $\frac{5x}{150}$ = 1 , Now to find x; (Happy)

Good work! Now, 6x/150 - 5x/150 = x/150 = 1, so x = 150. :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top