MHB Solving for x in $\frac{6x}{150}$ - $\frac{5x}{150}$ = 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation $\frac{6x}{150} - \frac{5x}{150} = 1$ simplifies to $\frac{x}{150} = 1$, leading to the solution $x = 150$. To find a common denominator, the least common multiple of 25 and 30 is determined to be 150. By multiplying the equation by 150, the terms simplify, confirming that $x$ equals 150. The discussion concludes with agreement on the correctness of the solution.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
$\frac{x}{25}$ - $\frac{x}{30}$ = 1 (Happy)

Okay, I see that they can come to a common denominator of,

$\frac{6x}{150}$ - $\frac{5x}{150}$ = 1 , Now to find x; (Happy)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by finding the LCM of 25 and 30. To do that, consider the prime factorizations:

$$25=5^2$$

$$30=2\cdot3\cdot5$$

Therefore:

$$\text{lcm}(25,30)=2\cdot3\cdot5^2=150$$

So, if we multiply the equation by 150, we obtain:

$$6x-5x=150$$

$$x=150$$

Does that make sense?
 
After getting into common denominator and subtracting,

$\frac{x}{150}$ =1

$\frac{x}{150}*150 =1*150 $

$ x = 150$ , Correct ? (Thinking)
 

Attachments

  • Capmbture.PNG
    Capmbture.PNG
    1.8 KB · Views: 78
Last edited:
mathlearn said:
$\frac{x}{25}$ - $\frac{x}{30}$ = 1 (Happy)

Okay, I see that they can come to a common denominator of,

$\frac{6x}{150}$ - $\frac{5x}{150}$ = 1 , Now to find x; (Happy)

Good work! Now, 6x/150 - 5x/150 = x/150 = 1, so x = 150. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top