Solving Fredholm Equation: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter huyhohoang
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a subroutine named "fred2," which is part of a program designed to solve integral equations. The main focus is on the purpose of the array "omk(i,j)" within the code. Initially, "omk" is set up as an identity matrix. The line "omk(i,j) = omk(i,j) - ak(t(i),t(j)) * w(j)" indicates that the matrix is being modified to reflect the equation OMK = I - AK * W, where I is the identity matrix, AK is a function applied to the input arrays, and W is a vector. This suggests that the author intended to optimize memory usage by repurposing the "omk" matrix to store the results of this operation. The clarification provided helps to understand the author's intent in the code structure.
huyhohoang
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi! I am now building a program to solve integral equation. I have understood the numerical method to solve it as well as others subroutines gauleg, ludcmp, lubksb but when I read this subroutine fred2 below, I don't know exactly the purpose of the author when putting the array omk(i,j) in the code. Can anyone give me some advice or instruction please?
Many thanks.
Fortran:
      SUBROUTINE fred2(n,a,b,t,f,w,g,ak)
      INTEGER n,NMAX
      REAL a,b,f(n),t(n),w(n),g,ak
      EXTERNAL ak,g
      PARAMETER (NMAX=200)
CU    USES ak,g,gauleg,lubksb,ludcmp
      INTEGER i,j,indx(NMAX)
      REAL d,omk(NMAX,NMAX)
      if(n.gt.NMAX) pause 'increase NMAX in fred2'
      call gauleg(a,b,t,w,n)
      do 12 i=1,n
        do 11 j=1,n
          if(i.eq.j)then
            omk(i,j)=1.
          else
            omk(i,j)=0.
          endif
          omk(i,j)=omk(i,j)-ak(t(i),t(j))*w(j)
11      continue
        f(i)=g(t(i))
12    continue
      call ludcmp(omk,n,NMAX,indx,d)
      call lubksb(omk,n,NMAX,indx,f)
      return
      END
 
Technology news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what the code is supposed to do but the omk array is setup basically like an identity matrix

and the line omk(i,j)-ak(t(i),t(j))*w(j) looks like the matrix equation OMK = I - AK*W

where I and AK are matrices and W is a vector.

OMK starts out in the code as the identity matrix and then its reused to hold the result of I - AK*W

so I guess the author was trying to save space by repurposing the OMK matrix memory.
 
Thanks. Now I understand the purpose of the authors.
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...
Back
Top