MHB Solving Inequality 4x-12≤6x+20

  • Thread starter Thread starter gazparkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality 4x - 12 ≤ 6x + 20, first rearrange the equation by moving all terms involving x to one side and constant terms to the other. This leads to 4x - 6x ≤ 20 + 12, simplifying to -2x ≤ 32. Dividing both sides by -2 reverses the inequality, yielding x ≥ -16. It is crucial to maintain the correct inequality sign throughout the process to ensure an accurate solution.
gazparkin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm working on solving linear equalities (with equations) and can anyone help with the below question. I know the answer is -16, but I can't figure out the steps that gets it to this.

4x-12≤6x+20

Once I've evened out the x's on both sides and got this to 2x, I'm then left with -12 and +20, which leaves +8, divided by the remaining 2x, which leaves 4. This isn't correct though, so could anyone help me with the different stages on this.

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello gazparkin.

gazparkin said:
Once I've evened out the x's on both sides and got this to 2x, I'm then left with -12 and +20, which leaves +8, divided by the remaining 2x, which leaves 4.
You’re on the right line, but when you move the $20$ from the RHS to the LHS, you should have $-20$, not $+20$.

gazparkin said:
the answer is -16
The answer is not just -16. The answer involves $-16$, the variable $x$, and an inequality sign in between. It’s important to get the inequality sign right, or you won’t get any marks for the question.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top