Solving Initial-value Problem: Different "C" Values Explained

Astro
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
Wondering why getting different values of "C" depending on how I solve the question. Not sure the values are different. Thanks.

1. Homework Statement

Solve the initial value problem cos(x)Ln(y) \frac{dy} {dx} =ysin(x), y>0, y(0)=e2.

Homework Equations


N/A.

The Attempt at a Solution



∫ \frac{Ln(y)} {y} dy=∫ \frac{sin x} {cos x} dx

u=Ln(y)
du=\frac{1} {y} dy
dy=y du​

∫ \frac{u} {y} y du=∫ tan(x) dx
## \frac{1} {2}u^2+C_1=Ln|sec(x)| + C_2 ##
##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ## ,Since ## C=C_2-C_1 ##
## Ln(y)=± \sqrt{2 Ln|sec(x)|+C} ## Equation #1
## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+C)} ##
--------------
## e^2=e^{+√(2Ln|sec(x)|+C)} ## Since y(0)=e2. Also, exponent cannot be -ve since LS.=RS.
## e^2=e^{+√(2(0)+C)} ##
##2=√C ##
## C=4 ##

Therefore ## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+4)} ## <--- ANS #1

However, if we try solving for C using eqn #1:

## \frac{1}{2}Ln^2(y)=Ln|sec(x)|+C ##
## \frac{1}{2}Ln^2(e^2)=Ln|sec(0)|+C ##
## \frac{1}{2}(2^2)Ln^2(e)=Ln(1)+C ##
## 2(1)=0+C ##
Therefore, ## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+2)} ## <----ANS #2.

However, obviously ANS #1 ≠ ANS #2. Can someone please help me understand why and what I did wrong?
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Astro said:
Wondering why getting different values of "C" depending on how I solve the question. Not sure the values are different. Thanks.

1. Homework Statement

Solve the initial value problem cos(x)Ln(y) \frac{dy} {dx} =ysin(x), y>0, y(0)=e2.

Homework Equations


N/A.

The Attempt at a Solution



∫ \frac{Ln(y)} {y} dy=∫ \frac{sin x} {cos x} dx

u=Ln(y)
du=\frac{1} {y} dy
dy=y du​

∫ \frac{u} {y} y du=∫ tan(x) dx
## \frac{1} {2}u^2+C_1=Ln|sec(x)| + C_2 ##
##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ## ,Since ## C=C_2-C_1 ##
## Ln(y)=± \sqrt{2 Ln|sec(x)|+C} ## Equation #1
## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+C)} ##
--------------
## e^2=e^{+√(2Ln|sec(x)|+C)} ## Since y(0)=e2. Also, exponent cannot be -ve since LS.=RS.
## e^2=e^{+√(2(0)+C)} ##
##2=√C ##
## C=4 ##

Therefore ## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+4)} ## <--- ANS #1

However, if we try solving for C using eqn #1:

## \frac{1}{2}Ln^2(y)=Ln|sec(x)|+C ##
## \frac{1}{2}Ln^2(e^2)=Ln|sec(0)|+C ##
## \frac{1}{2}(2^2)Ln^2(e)=Ln(1)+C ##
## 2(1)=0+C ##
Therefore, ## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+2)} ## <----ANS #2.

However, obviously ANS #1 ≠ ANS #2. Can someone please help me understand why and what I did wrong?
Thanks.
You don't use eqn #1 in the second part, but the equation immediately above it:
##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ##
Notice that ##C_3## is not equal to your final ##C##.
 
Astro said:
##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ## ,Since ## C=C_2-C_1 ##
## Ln(y)=± \sqrt{2 Ln|sec(x)|+C} ## Equation #1
The two "C" here differ by a factor of 2.
Approach 1 is correct, approach 2 gives you C3 = 1/2 C = 2 which leads to C=4 as well.
 
I'm not sure I follow.

To solve for the correct answer for "C" (which is C=4 according to the textbook), all I did was rearrange ## \frac{1}{2}Ln^2(y)=Ln|sec(x)|+C ## to solve for "y" and then subbing in the initial values x=0, and y=e^2 gives you ## e^2=e^{\sqrt{C}} ## from which you get C=4. But, when I sub in the initial values directly into ## \frac{1}{2}Ln^2(y)=Ln|sec(x)|+C ## and rearrange for C I get a different answer. It's unclear to me why I'm getting different answers because in both cases the variable C is the same. Solving for C two different ways when you're only rearranging the equation differently to find C should give you the same answer if you apply the rules of logarithms and exponents correctly. The fact that I'm not getting the same value of C means that I'm not understanding some basic concept of math or that I'm making a mistake when I'm rearranging and solving for C.
 
Astro said:
##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ## ,Since ## C=C_2-C_1 ##
## Ln(y)=± \sqrt{2 Ln|sec(x)|+C} ## Equation #1
## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+C)} ##
.
You forgot to multiply C2-C1 by 2.
 
Astro said:
I'm not sure I follow.

To solve for the correct answer for "C" (which is C=4 according to the textbook), all I did was rearrange ## \frac{1}{2}Ln^2(y)=Ln|sec(x)|+C ## to solve for "y" and then subbing in the initial values x=0, and y=e^2 gives you ## e^2=e^{\sqrt{C}} ## from which you get C=4. But, when I sub in the initial values directly into ## \frac{1}{2}Ln^2(y)=Ln|sec(x)|+C ## and rearrange for C I get a different answer. It's unclear to me why I'm getting different answers because in both cases the variable C is the same. Solving for C two different ways when you're only rearranging the equation differently to find C should give you the same answer if you apply the rules of logarithms and exponents correctly. The fact that I'm not getting the same value of C means that I'm not understanding some basic concept of math or that I'm making a mistake when I'm rearranging and solving for C.
(bolding mine)
What I bolded is wrong.
Astro said:
##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ## ,Since ## C=C_2-C_1 ##
## Ln(y)=± \sqrt{2 Ln|sec(x)|+C} ## Equation #1
## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+C)} ##
When you solve for ##C## using ## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+C)} ##, you find ##C=4##. That is correct.
When you solve for ##C_3## using ##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ##, you find ##C_3=2##. That is correct too.
But, as mfb, ehild and myself have mentionned, the constants in these two equations are not equal. You confused yourself by renaming ##C_3## to ##C## when you tried to find the constant using ##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ##.
Let's rewrite you equations keeping ##C_3##:
##\frac{1} {2}Ln^2 (y)=Ln|sec(x)| + C_3 ##
## Ln(y)=± \sqrt{2 Ln|sec(x)|+2C_3} ##
## y=e^{± √(2Ln|sec(x)|+2C_3)} ##.

You see? Your final ##C=2C_3##, that's why you find 4 using one equation, and 2 using the other.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top