Solving Integration Problem: Advice Needed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter architect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a complex integration problem involving double integrals and special functions, specifically focusing on the use of modified Bessel functions and Legendre polynomials. Participants explore various methods to simplify or transform the integral for easier computation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Alex, presents an integration problem and discusses attempts to rewrite the integral using an infinite series representation from Abramowitz and Stegun's book.
  • Alex proposes substituting a specific equation for the modified Bessel function and questions how to rewrite the Legendre polynomial, considering the Addition Theorem of Spherical Harmonics.
  • Another participant suggests that Alex's approach may be correct but raises concerns about justifying the exchange of the double integral with the sum.
  • This second participant provides alternative identities from N.N. Lebedev's book that could potentially simplify the calculations.
  • Alex expresses concern that using the integral representation for the Legendre polynomial might complicate the problem further.
  • The second participant acknowledges this concern but emphasizes that the effectiveness of different representations can vary, suggesting a trial-and-error approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to solve the integral, with differing opinions on the complexity of various methods and representations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal path forward.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made in the transformations and the potential complexity introduced by different representations of special functions. The discussion does not resolve these issues.

architect
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I would like to get some advice regarding a difficult integration problem.

[tex]\int_{\varphi_{o}-\Delta\varphi}^{\varphi_{o}+\Delta\varphi}\int_{\vartheta_{o}-\Delta\vartheta}^{\vartheta_{o}+\Delta\vartheta}e^{\kappa[sin\vartheta_{o}\sin\vartheta\sin\varthetacos(\varphi-\varphi_{o})+cos\vartheta_{o}cos\vartheta]}sin\vartheta\partial\vartheta\partial\varphi[/tex] Equation 1

Let me briefly explain what I have attempted so far.

I know that I can re-write Equation 1 as

[tex]\int_{\varphi_{o}-\Delta\varphi}^{\varphi_{o}+\Delta\varphi}\int_{\vartheta_{o}-\Delta\vartheta}^{\vartheta_{o}+\Delta\vartheta}e^{\kappa\cos\gamma}sin\vartheta\partial\vartheta\partial\varphi[/tex] Equation 2

This is because [tex]\gamma[/tex] can be thought of as the angular displacement from [tex](\theta,\varphi) to (\theta_{o},\varphi_{o})[/tex]. We can therefore write

[tex]\cos\gamma=sin\vartheta_{o}\sin\vartheta\sin\varthetacos(\varphi-\varphi_{o})+cos\vartheta_{o}cos\vartheta[/tex]

Since I could not see a straight forward solution I thought of re-writing the above integral in terms of an infinite series represantation and then integrate the series(which would be simpler). I noticed that in Abramowitz and Stegun 's's book (Handbook of Mathematical Functions) there is an equation which might help me achieve my goal. This is equation 10.2.36 and can be found in the following website.

[tex]e^{\kappa\cos\gamma}=\sum^{\infty}_{0}(2n+1)[\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2\kappa}}I_{n+1/2}(\kappa)]P_{n}(cos\gamma)[/tex] Equation 3 or 10.2.36 in Abramowitz&Stegun

where we have the modified bessel function and a Legendre polynomial. Therefore my new integrand will be:

[tex]\int_{\varphi_{o}-\Delta\varphi}^{\varphi_{o}+\Delta\varphi}\int_{\vartheta_{o}-\Delta\vartheta}^{\vartheta_{o}+\Delta\vartheta}\sum^{\infty}_{0}(2n+1)[\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2\kappa}}I_{n+1/2}(\kappa)]P_{n}(cos\gamma)sin\vartheta\partial\vartheta\partial\varphi[/tex] Equation 4

Now I think I must do something about the modified bessel function and the Legendre polynomial.

Do you think I can substitute Equation 10.2.5 from Abramowitz&Stegun (http://www.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/page_443.htm) for the modified Bessel Funtion?

How would I re-write the Legendre polynomial in this case? Can I use the Addition Theorem of Spherical Harmonics?Or I will complicate things even further?If I use the Addition Theorem then I would get:

[tex]P_{n}(\cos\gamma)=\sum^{n}_{m=-n}\Upsilon^{*}_{nm}(\vartheta_{o},\varphi_{o})\Upsilon{nm}(\vartheta,\varphi)[/tex] Will this be correct?

Please advise if you think that the procedure I have followed so far is incorrect!

Thanks & Regards

Alex
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that would be correct. The problem can be justifying the exchange of the double integral with the sum.

Is the first integral in it's original form or have you already transformed it? Maybe there is a simpler way to express it?

---EDIT---
I've found this two identities in N.N. Lebedev's book:

[tex]P_n(\cos \theta)=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_0^\pi (\cos \theta +i\sin \theta \cos \varphi)^n d\varphi,\qquad 0<\theta<\pi.[/tex]

[tex]e^{ika \cos \varphi}=J_0(ka)+2\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^nJ_n(ka) \cos n\varphi,[/tex]

where [itex]J_n[/itex] are Bessel functions of order [itex]n[/itex].

Maybe this can help.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

Many Thanks for your reply. Yes the first double integral is in its original form (Equation 1). The expression that you wrote for the Legendre polynomial from Lebedev's book will it not make it more complicated(because of the integral)?

Thanks again

Regards

Alex
 
Could be, the only way to find out is to get your hands dirty!

I posted both formulas in order to give you another choice for your calculations. The thing with special functions is that some representations make the work easier, while others make it impossible. Let me know how it went.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K