Solving Laplace Equation on Square: Proving |u|<=1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechmathian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the Laplace equation (\Delta u(x, y)=0) on a square domain [0, 1] x [0, 1] with specified boundary conditions. Participants explore the implications of these conditions for proving that the modulus of the solution function |u| is less than or equal to 1.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the boundary conditions for u and suggests proving that |u| <= 1 based on these conditions.
  • Another participant argues that a harmonic function achieves its maximum on the boundary and applies the maximum modulus principle to conclude that |u| must be bounded by 1, referencing the boundary conditions of sin and cos.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the necessity of the other two boundary conditions and seeks clarification on the concept of redefining the function as an analytic function on the complex plane.
  • Another participant acknowledges the correctness of the previous points but still finds one question about the boundary conditions unclear.
  • A later reply suggests that if the maximum of |u| exceeds 1, it must occur on the other two sides of the square, implying that the first two sides have been accounted for.
  • One participant claims to have solved the problem, but no details are provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding the implications of the boundary conditions and the application of the maximum modulus principle. Some points are clarified, but uncertainty remains about the necessity of all boundary conditions and the interpretation of analytic functions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the role of the additional boundary conditions and the application of the maximum modulus principle in this specific context.

Mechmathian
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
We look at a Laplace equation ([tex]\Delta u(x, y)=0)[/tex] ) on a square [0, 1]* [0, 1]
If we know that [tex]u|_{x = 0}[/tex]= siny , [tex]u|_{x = 1}[/tex]= cosy
[tex]u'_{y}|_{y = 0}[/tex]= 0 , [tex]u'_{y}|_{y = 1}[/tex]= 0 we differentiate here by y. proove that |u|<=1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A harmonic function that is not constant has to achieve it's max on the boundary, else it's constant. This is because you can redefine it as an analytic function on the complex plane (since it's harmonic) and apply the maximum modulus principle.

Your solution is then bounded by the bounds it attains on the boundary, which are sin and cos, so they are bounded by 1 which means the modulus of the function itself must be bounded by 1 everywhere (if not then you can find a point in the interior where the function achieves a global max and then forces the function to be constant).

I could be completely off though, it's been along time.
 
Thank you for the answer. It might be right, but I have some questions
1) What are the other 2 boundary conditions given for?
2) I didn't quite understand what you mean by redefining the function as an analytical one on a complex plane.. There does exist a theorem that if u is harmonic, then there exists a harmonic function v, such that u+iv is analytical..
 
Actually what you have said is right.. The second question is taken out. The first one is still unclear to me
 
what I meant to say is that if the maximum is greater then one then it has to be on the other two sides of the square, we just eliminated the first two sides..
 
Solved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
959
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K