Solving Linear Combinations of Positive Stamp Values

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving linear combinations of two positive stamp values, denoted as 'a' and 'b', where both values are greater than 1. It establishes that if 'a' and 'b' are coprime, all integers beyond a certain point can be expressed as combinations of these stamps. Specifically, for coprime values like 5 and 8, once a sequence of consecutive integers is reached, all subsequent integers can also be formed. The discussion also touches on the concept of the Frobenius coin problem, indicating that the largest non-expressible value is given by the formula ab - a - b.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear combinations in mathematics
  • Knowledge of coprime numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Frobenius coin problem
  • Basic algebraic manipulation and series analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Frobenius coin problem and its implications for linear combinations
  • Explore proofs related to the existence of consecutive integers in linear combinations
  • Study the properties of coprime integers and their applications in number theory
  • Learn about generating functions and their role in combinatorial mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in combinatorial optimization problems.

adamg
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
this is quite a classic problem i think but I am having difficulty finishing it off. If we have two stamps of positive values a and b, (greater than 1), what values can be expressed as a linear combination of these 2 stamps. If the stamps have a highest common factor greater than 1, then there are infinitely many 'bad' numbers. But if the numbers are coprime, after a certain point, all numbers are possible. For instance, with 5 and 8, in the list of possible numbers, you eventually get 28,29,30,31,32, therefore by adding 5's every other number is possible.
Can anyone help me prove the fact the if you have a and b, with a<b, then eventually you get 'a' consecutive numbers in the list of possibles. (therefore making all subsequent numbers possible).
Any other angle welcome!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
think the upper limit of not-possible numbers may be ab-a-b on the basis of a number of examples
 
I presume you mean for A and B to be non-negative. Since we have, in the example given, the case of 5(-3) + 8(2) =1, we see that every integer is possible.

In the example given: 5A+8B =30, and 5A+8B=32, the first case demands that 5 divide B and the second that 8 divides A. So those cases are only solved in non-negative terms with a zero for A or B. Assuming A less than B, to get A successive values, one of them will be divisible by A giving us a zero coefficient for B.

So I wonder if that was how you are seeing the problem?
 
Last edited:
yes, a and b must be non-negative, as must the numbers of each i.e. can't have negative numbers of stamps.
 
Well, here is a start: Let B = A+1. Look at series of A terms: (A+1) + A(A-1)=A^2+1; 2(A+1)+A(A-2)=A^2+2...A(A+1) + A(A-A) =A^2+A.

This series fulfillls the necessary requirements and starts at (A+1) +A(A-1) =A^2+1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K