Solving ln|x| Improper Integral: -1 to 1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of ln|x| from -1 to 1 does not converge due to the singularity at x=0. The proper evaluation involves separating the integral into two limits: the limit as h approaches 0 from the positive side and the limit as k approaches 0 from the positive side. The anti-derivative of ln|x| is defined differently for positive and negative x, leading to the conclusion that the limits do not exist. The result obtained by incorrectly combining the limits is known as the Cauchy Principal Value, which is not applicable in this case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of limits and continuity in calculus
  • Ability to compute anti-derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of improper integrals in detail
  • Learn about the Cauchy Principal Value and its applications
  • Explore the properties of logarithmic functions in calculus
  • Review techniques for evaluating limits involving singularities
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians analyzing improper integrals, and anyone interested in the convergence properties of logarithmic functions.

james5
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hi, why is ln|x|, from -1 to 1, converging?

is "0" the bad point, and must i break up the integral from 1 to $, where $ = 0, and from $ to -1... so i have xlnx-x as my derivative... and i get -2?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since this has nothing to do with "differential equations" I am moving it to "calculus".

I can't tell you "why is ln|x|, from -1 to 1, converging" or even the question I think you intended: "why is the integral of ln|x|, from -1 to 1, converging", because it isn't! The definition of an improper integral of f(x), from -1 to 1 where there is a singularity at x= 0, is
[tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\int_{-1}^h f(t)dt+ \lim_{k\rightarrow 0}\int_k^1 f(t)dt[/tex]
Notice that the two limits are taken separately. Yes, an anti-derivative of ln x is x ln x- x (for x> 0). An anti-derivative of ln(-x), for x< 0 is x ln(-x)+ x. Therefore
[tex]\int_{-1}^1 ln|x|dx= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0^+}(-hln(h)-h)+\lim_{k\rightarrow 0^+}(kln(k)-k)[/tex]
and neither of those limits exist.
What you found, by taking both limits with "h" so that they canceled out is the "Cauchy Principal Value" which has some occaisional uses but I don't think gives any good information here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K