Solving Math Problem: Why is m=2, not 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hidemi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the value of m in a math problem involving wave interference. The original calculation using m=1 yields incorrect results, while substituting m=2 leads to a correct answer of θ=29. However, further clarification reveals that the correct application of the formula with m=2 actually results in θ=0.57º, indicating an arithmetic error in the calculations. Additionally, the correct distance d should be 0.3*10^-9 m instead of 3*10^-9 m. The participant acknowledges the mistake and seeks further assistance.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
An x-ray beam of wavelength 3 x~ 10^−11 m is incident on a calcite crystal of lattice spacing 0.3 nm. The smallest angle between crystal planes and the x-ray beam which will result in constructive interference is:

A. 2.9◦
B. 5.7◦
C. 12◦
D. 23◦
E. none of these

The answer is A



2 d sinθ = m λ

2x0.3x10^-9 sinθ = 2.3 x 10^-11

However, why is the m=2 ?
Relevant Equations
2 d sinθ = m λ
I calculate by :
2 *3*10^−9* sinθ = 1 * 3 *10^−11
but can not get a correct answer.

If I substitute the m by 2:
2 *3 *10^−9 * sinθ = 2* 3 * 10^−11
then the answer : θ=29 is correct

I wonder why the m is 2 not 1. Could someone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hidemi said:
I calculate by :
2 *3*10^−9* sinθ = 1 * 3 *10^−11
but can not get a correct answer.

If I substitute the m by 2:
2 *3 *10^−9 * sinθ = 2* 3 * 10^−11
then the answer : θ=29 is correct

I wonder why the m is 2 not 1. Could someone help me?
You have used d = 3*10^-9m instead of d = 0.3*10^-9 m.

And (when using m=2) your equation "2 *3 *10^−9 * sinθ = 2* 3 * 10^−11" gives θ = 0.57º, not "θ=29". So you are making some arithmetic error as well (incorrect use of brackets on calculator?).

With m=1:
mλ/(2d) = 1 * 3*10⁻¹¹ / (2 * 0.3*10⁻⁹) = 0.05
θ = sin⁻¹(mλ/(2d)) = sin⁻¹(0.05) = 2.9º (Answer A).
 
Steve4Physics said:
You have used d = 3*10^-9m instead of d = 0.3*10^-9 m.

And (when using m=2) your equation "2 *3 *10^−9 * sinθ = 2* 3 * 10^−11" gives θ = 0.57º, not "θ=29". So you are making some arithmetic error as well (incorrect use of brackets on calculator?).

With m=1:
mλ/(2d) = 1 * 3*10⁻¹¹ / (2 * 0.3*10⁻⁹) = 0.05
θ = sin⁻¹(mλ/(2d)) = sin⁻¹(0.05) = 2.9º (Answer A).
Thanks for pointing out my mistake.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top