Solving Math Problem: Why is m=2, not 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hidemi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the value of m in a math problem involving wave interference. The original calculation using m=1 yields incorrect results, while substituting m=2 leads to a correct answer of θ=29. However, further clarification reveals that the correct application of the formula with m=2 actually results in θ=0.57º, indicating an arithmetic error in the calculations. Additionally, the correct distance d should be 0.3*10^-9 m instead of 3*10^-9 m. The participant acknowledges the mistake and seeks further assistance.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
An x-ray beam of wavelength 3 x~ 10^−11 m is incident on a calcite crystal of lattice spacing 0.3 nm. The smallest angle between crystal planes and the x-ray beam which will result in constructive interference is:

A. 2.9◦
B. 5.7◦
C. 12◦
D. 23◦
E. none of these

The answer is A



2 d sinθ = m λ

2x0.3x10^-9 sinθ = 2.3 x 10^-11

However, why is the m=2 ?
Relevant Equations
2 d sinθ = m λ
I calculate by :
2 *3*10^−9* sinθ = 1 * 3 *10^−11
but can not get a correct answer.

If I substitute the m by 2:
2 *3 *10^−9 * sinθ = 2* 3 * 10^−11
then the answer : θ=29 is correct

I wonder why the m is 2 not 1. Could someone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hidemi said:
I calculate by :
2 *3*10^−9* sinθ = 1 * 3 *10^−11
but can not get a correct answer.

If I substitute the m by 2:
2 *3 *10^−9 * sinθ = 2* 3 * 10^−11
then the answer : θ=29 is correct

I wonder why the m is 2 not 1. Could someone help me?
You have used d = 3*10^-9m instead of d = 0.3*10^-9 m.

And (when using m=2) your equation "2 *3 *10^−9 * sinθ = 2* 3 * 10^−11" gives θ = 0.57º, not "θ=29". So you are making some arithmetic error as well (incorrect use of brackets on calculator?).

With m=1:
mλ/(2d) = 1 * 3*10⁻¹¹ / (2 * 0.3*10⁻⁹) = 0.05
θ = sin⁻¹(mλ/(2d)) = sin⁻¹(0.05) = 2.9º (Answer A).
 
Steve4Physics said:
You have used d = 3*10^-9m instead of d = 0.3*10^-9 m.

And (when using m=2) your equation "2 *3 *10^−9 * sinθ = 2* 3 * 10^−11" gives θ = 0.57º, not "θ=29". So you are making some arithmetic error as well (incorrect use of brackets on calculator?).

With m=1:
mλ/(2d) = 1 * 3*10⁻¹¹ / (2 * 0.3*10⁻⁹) = 0.05
θ = sin⁻¹(mλ/(2d)) = sin⁻¹(0.05) = 2.9º (Answer A).
Thanks for pointing out my mistake.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top