Solving PDE by using another function

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Markov2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving the partial differential equation (PDE) given by {{u}_{tt}}={{c}^{2}}{{u}_{xx}}+A{{e}^{-x}} with specified boundary and initial conditions. The approach involves introducing a new variable, v(t,x), to transform the original PDE into a homogeneous form. The solution utilizes separation of variables and Fourier sine series to address the nonhomogeneous term. The final transformed equation is v_{tt}={{c}^{2}}{{v}_{xx}} with adjusted boundary and initial conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems
  • Knowledge of Fourier series, particularly Fourier sine series
  • Proficiency in separation of variables technique
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables for PDEs
  • Learn about Fourier sine series and their applications in solving boundary value problems
  • Explore techniques for transforming nonhomogeneous PDEs into homogeneous forms
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions on the solutions of PDEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with boundary value problems in partial differential equations, particularly those interested in the application of Fourier series and separation of variables methods.

Markov2
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Solve

$\begin{aligned} & {{u}_{tt}}={{c}^{2}}{{u}_{xx}}+A{{e}^{-x}},\text{ }0<x<L,\text{ }t>0, \\
& u(0,t)=B,\text{ }u(L,t)=M,\text{ }t>0, \\
& u(x,0)=0={{u}_{t}}(x,0),\text{ 0}<x<L.
\end{aligned}
$

What do I need to do first? Homogenize the first boundary conditions? Or first making the equation homogeneous? What's the shorter way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, introduce a new variable $v(t,x)$ such that $u(t,x) = v(t,x) + ax + b$ and choose $a$ and $b$ such that

$u(0,t)=B$ becomes $v(0,t) = 0$

and

$u(L,t)=M$ becomes $v(L,t) = 0$.

Then see how the PDE and IC's change.
 
Okay you mean take $w(x,t)=u(x,t)-v(x,t)$ where $v(x,t)=B-(B-M)\dfrac xL,$ then $w(x,t)$ satisfies the first boundary conditions, is this the procedure?
 
Next, to solve the homogenous problem

$w_{tt} = c^2 w_{xx}$

$w(0,t) = 0, w(L,t) = 0$

you would use separation of variables leading to

$u = \displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n \sin \dfrac{c n \pi}{L}t \sin \dfrac{n\pi}{L}x$.

However, since the new PDE is nonhomogeneous, you'll need to expand the source term (the exponential) in terms of a Fourier sine series and then seek a solution of the form

u = $\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} T_n(t) \sin \dfrac{n\pi}{L}x$.

See where that takes you.
 
Okay, it looks a bit messy from there. I homogenized first the equation, so I let $v(x,t)=u(x,t)+\dfrac{A{{e}^{-x}}}{{{c}^{2}}}$ so that $u(x,t)=v(x,t)-\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}$ then $u_{tt}=v_{tt}$ and $u_x=v_x+\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}$ and $u_{xx}=v_{xx}-\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}$ so replacing this to the ODE I get $v_{tt}=c^2\left(v_{xx}-\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}\right)+Ae^{-x}=c^2v_{xx}.$ Now the boundaries are $u(0,t)=v(0,t)-\dfrac A{c^2}=B$ so $v(0,t)=B+\dfrac A{c^2}$ and $u(L,t)=v(L,t)-\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-L}=M$ so $v(L,t)=M+\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-L}$ and finally $u(x,0)=v(x,0)-\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}=0\implies v(x,0)=\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}$ and $u_t(x,0)=v_t(x,0)$ so the new equation equals:

$\begin{aligned} & {{v}_{tt}}={{c}^{2}}{{v}_{xx}} \\
& v(0,t)=B+\frac{A}{{{c}^{2}}},\text{ }v(L,t)=M+\frac{A}{{{c}^{2}}}{{e}^{-L}} \\
& v(x,0)=\frac{A}{{{c}^{2}}}{{e}^{-x}},\text{ }{{v}_{t}}(x,0)=0.
\end{aligned}
$

Do I need to define another function to homogenize boundary conditions? I'm worry about this since the $v(x,0)$ condition is not zero, how to proceed? Am I on the right track?
 
I managed to get it. I was drowning myself on a glass of water, I hadn't checked my notes. Thanks for the help anyway!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K