MHB Solving Probability Coupling Problems: X & Y

Harambe1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm struggling to understand probability coupling. I have the following problem:

Let X and Y each be uniformly distributed on the discrete set {1,...6} (i.e. the distribution of the roll of 1 fair die).
(a) If X and Y are independent, what is Pr[X = Y]?
(b) Couple X and Y so that Pr[X = Y] = 1.
(c) Couple X and Y so that Pr[X > Y] = 5/6.

I'm not entirely sure where to start and can't find much information on it.

For part (b), would I be right in simply saying "Let X={1,2,...,6} and let Y={X}. Thus, Pr[X = Y] = 1." If so, great but if not where am I going wrong?

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Harambe said:
Hi, I'm struggling to understand probability coupling. I have the following problem:

Let X and Y each be uniformly distributed on the discrete set {1,...6} (i.e. the distribution of the roll of 1 fair die).
(a) If X and Y are independent, what is Pr[X = Y]?
(b) Couple X and Y so that Pr[X = Y] = 1.
(c) Couple X and Y so that Pr[X > Y] = 5/6.

I'm not entirely sure where to start and can't find much information on it.

For part (b), would I be right in simply saying "Let X={1,2,...,6} and let Y={X}. Thus, Pr[X = Y] = 1." If so, great but if not where am I going wrong?

Thanks for your help.

Start by drawing up a 2-way table which shows what you can roll from the two dice. How many possibilities are there? How many of those possibilities have the rolls the same?
 
There are 6 possible outcomes for each of X and Y so there are 36 possible outcomes for (X, Y). In 6 of those X= Y.

For b, you say "let Y= {x}". What are the braces intended to mean here? Why not just "Y= X"?

For the third, write out all 36 possible outcomes. Find a subset containing 6 of those outcomes such that X> Y in 5 of them. It is not necessary that you be able to write a "formula" describing them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top