Solving Probability Question Homework re:Discrimination in Jury Selection

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhfs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a statistical analysis related to jury selection discrimination in the case of Mr. Partida, a Mexican-American convicted in Texas in 1972. The jury's composition was challenged based on a census indicating that Mexican-Americans constituted 79.1% of the adult population, while only 39% of jury members were Mexican-American. To determine if this discrepancy indicates discrimination, participants suggested using the Normal approximation to the binomial distribution, calculating the standard variable z to assess if the probability of obtaining a jury with 39% or less Mexican-Americans is less than 1%. The conclusion drawn is that statistical evidence supports the claim of discrimination in jury selection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binomial distribution and its properties
  • Familiarity with Normal approximation techniques
  • Knowledge of hypothesis testing and p-values
  • Ability to calculate standard deviation and z-scores
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the Central Limit Theorem and its application in hypothesis testing
  • Study the use of z-scores in determining probabilities from the Normal distribution
  • Explore statistical software tools for conducting binomial tests
  • Investigate case studies on jury selection and discrimination in legal contexts
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, law students, legal professionals, and anyone interested in the intersection of statistics and civil rights issues will benefit from this discussion.

zhfs
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question relates to a famous court case in the USA where for the first time results of
statistical analysis were presented as evidence of discrimination. In 1972 Mr Partida, a
Mexican-American, was convicted of burglary by a jury in a particular county in Texas.
Mr Partida’s lawyers, appealed the conviction on the grounds that the jury must have
been selected in a discriminatory (and thus non-random fashion) because it had a
disproportionately small number of Mexican-Americans on it. They based their argument
on the following two pieces of information. First, a recent census had shown Mexican-
Americans made up 79.1% of adults in the population in that county and that this fact
was widely accepted. Second, in a sample of court cases in the county involving a total of
870 jury members, only 39% were Mexican-Americans. Assume that we will conclude
that jury selection in the county was discriminatory if there is less than a 1% chance that
a sample proportion of 39% (or less) would result from random selection from a
population where the proportion was 79.1%. If you were a Justice of the US Supreme
Court, what would your finding be? Would you find that there probably was
discrimination in jury selection in the county?


Homework Equations



lets put Pr[A] = 0.791
Pr = 0.39
number of Mexican American Jury is 870*0.39=339


The Attempt at a Solution



i was thinking use Pr[A|B] to work it out, but since event A and B are dependent, so i can't keep going

also i try using 870C339 (0.791)^339 (0.209)^(870-339)
but this one is at zero..

so can anyone give me some hint? i am totally lost on "less than a 1% chance that
a sample proportion of 39% (or less) would result from random selection from a
population where the proportion was 79.1%"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With large numbers like those, I would be inclined to use the Normal approximation to the binomal distribution. If Mexican-Americans make up 79.1% of the population, then p= 0.791 and q= 1-0.791= 0.209. Fair selection would be binomial distribution with mean p= 0.791 and standard deviation \sqrt{pq}= \sqrt{(0.791)(0.209)}= \sqrt{0.165319}= 0.4066.

The "standard variable" would be z= \frac{x- \mu}{\sigma}= \frac{0.39- 0.791}{0.4066}. Look that up in a table of the normal distribution to see if the probability of getting that, or less, is less than 1%.

A good table is at http://www.math.unb.ca/~knight/utility/NormTble.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K