Solving Projector Question on Mixed States

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter raisin_raisin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical expression involving mixed states in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the application of the distributive law to projectors and density matrices. Participants are examining the validity of a previously noted equation and exploring the implications of their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of their earlier expression involving projectors and a mixed state density matrix, seeking clarification on whether their original understanding was flawed.
  • Another participant suggests using the distributive law to manipulate the expression, providing a detailed breakdown of the steps involved in the calculation.
  • The second participant outlines specific applications of the distributive law to the expression, leading to a more expanded form that includes terms for all combinations of the basis states.
  • A third participant offers a workaround for a technical issue related to previewing LaTeX in the forum, which is not directly related to the mathematical discussion but addresses a practical concern for posting.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the correctness of the original expression or the subsequent manipulations, as the discussion includes differing interpretations of the mathematical steps involved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the assumptions underlying the manipulation of the density matrix or the application of the distributive law, leaving some steps and interpretations open to further scrutiny.

raisin_raisin
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A few months ago I wrote this line down, but it does not seem to follow any more. Am I mistaking a mistake now or when I first wrote it down? thanks
[tex]( | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | + | 1 \rangle \langle 1 |) \rho ( | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | + | 1 \rangle \langle 1 |)[/tex]


[tex]= | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | \rho | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | + | 1 \rangle \langle 1 | \rho | 1 \rangle \langle 1 |[/tex]

where [tex]\rho[/tex] is an arbitrary mixed state.

(It is not letting me preview my latex so fingers crossed this works as expected)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to use the distributive law
1. a*(b+c) = ab + ac
2. (a+b)*(c+d) = (ac + ad + bc + bd)[tex] ( | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | + | 1 \rangle \langle 1 |) \rho ( | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | + | 1 \rangle \langle 1 |) [/tex]

[tex] =( | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | + | 1 \rangle \langle 1 |) (\rho | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | +\rho | 1 \rangle \langle 1 |) [/tex]

[tex] = \langle 0 | \rho | 0 \rangle \cdot | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | + \langle 0 | \rho | 1 \rangle \cdot | 0 \rangle \langle 1 | + \langle 1 | \rho | 0 \rangle \cdot | 1 \rangle \langle 0 | + \langle 1 | \rho | 1 \rangle \cdot | 1 \rangle \langle 1 |[/tex]A fast online latex equation editor is here:
http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php
 
Last edited:
To workaround the preview problem, hit your browser's refresh button when the incorrect image comes up, and then confirm that you want to send the information one more time. You can also edit your post up to 24 hours after you posted it.
 
Thanks for this trick, didn't know about it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K