Solving Quadratic Equation: Explaining Why "a" Must be Equal to 1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the quadratic equation and the implications of the leading coefficient "a" in the expression f(x) = 4x^2 + 5x + 1. Participants are exploring the conditions under which the roots of the equation can be accurately determined and the role of completing the square in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding the roots of a quadratic equation and question the necessity of having "a" equal to 1 for certain methods to work. There are attempts to clarify the quadratic formula and the process of completing the square. Some participants express confusion regarding the handling of complex roots and the relationship between the roots and the original polynomial.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the quadratic formula and its application to both real and complex roots. Some participants have provided guidance on the importance of the leading coefficient and its effect on the factorization of the polynomial. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being considered, particularly regarding the treatment of complex roots.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention an upcoming engineering test, indicating a time constraint that may affect their engagement with the topic. There are references to potential misunderstandings about the quadratic formula and the conditions under which it applies.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Umm... I guess I don't remember this from algebra, but I have a rather basic question.

Let's say you have the expression,
[tex]f(x) = 4x^2 + 5x + 1[/tex]

And we want to find the roots.

So,

[tex]\frac{-5 \pm \sqrt{5-4(4)}}{2(4)}= \{ \frac{1}{2},-1 \}[/tex]

Now, if we plug these into [itex]f(x)[/itex] we have:
[tex]f(1/2) = 9/2[/tex]
[tex]f(-1) = 0[/tex]

So obviously the quadratic equation does not yield the roots. But if we let [itex]a=1[/itex].

[tex]4(x^2+\frac{5}{4}x+\frac{1}{4})[/tex]
Again, using the quadratic:
[tex]x = \{ -1,-\frac{1}{4} \}[/tex]

So now plugging this into [itex]f(x)[/itex]

[tex]f(x) = 4(x^2+\frac{5}{4}x+\frac{1}{4})[/tex]

yields:
[tex]f(-1) = 0[/tex]
[tex]f(\frac{-1}{4}) = 0[/tex]

So what gives. I don't think I was ever taught that "a" has to be equal to 1 for it to hold.

If someone could clarify why this is that would be awesome. I seem to remember something about completing the square, but the thing is, is I have an engineering test on Thursday, and the last thing I want to be using my time on is figuring out why this is. But I'm curious :smile:

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FrogPad said:
Let's say you have the expression,
[tex]f(x) = 4x^2 + 5x + 1[/tex]

And we want to find the roots.

So,

[tex]\frac{-5 \pm \sqrt{-4(4)}}{2(4)}= \{ \frac{1}{2},-1 \}[/tex]

Recheck your quadratic equation. It should be:
[tex]\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 -4ac}}{2a}[/tex]

You forgot to take the sqrt of b^2 - 4ac :smile:
 
Last edited:
You can also try to complete the square or find the numbers m, n such as m*n = c and m+n = b when a = 1 .
 
Last edited:
mbrmbrg said:
Recheck your quadratic equation. It should be:
[tex]\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 -4ac}}{2a}[/tex]

You forgot to take the sqrt of b^2 - 4ac :smile:

:blushing:

Ok, cool... so I'm not crazy. It works fine for the reals. Now when I get complex conjugates, it seems to be a different story. Please tell me I'm making a simple mistake again ! :cry:


[tex]f(s) = 10s^2 + 10s + 40[/tex]
[tex]\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-10 \pm \sqrt{100-4(10)(40)}}{2(10)}=\frac{-10 \pm\sqrt{-1500}}{2(10)} = \ldots[/tex]
[tex]\ldots = \left\{ \frac{-1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{15}}{2}j \,\, , \,\, \frac{-1}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{15}}{2}j \right\} = \{ \lambda_1 \,\, , \,\, \lambda_2 \}[/tex]
[tex]f(\lambda_1) = f(\lambda_2) = 0[/tex]
So that's cool. But what about,

[tex](s-\lambda_1)(s-\lambda_2)=s^2+s+4[/tex]

If the roots were real then wouldn't that equal the original function. Maybe I'm doing drugs, because I can't believe I'm getting caught up with this right now
 
It works fine for complex roots.

In your examples of s^2+s+4 and 10s^2+10s+40, remember if u and v are roots of a polynomial ax^2+bx+c, then

ax^2+bx+c=a*(x-u)*(x-v)

it's not just a product over factors corresponding to the roots, you need to take care of the leading coefficient as well.
 
shmoe said:
ax^2+bx+c=a*(x-u)*(x-v)

it's not just a product over factors corresponding to the roots, you need to take care of the leading coefficient as well.

:cool:

Ahh, that's what I was missing! Thanks man. I can't believe I forgot that :mad:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K