Solving Radially-Directed Geodesics in AdS Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesics Space
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the trajectory of radially-directed geodesics in global Anti-de Sitter (AdS) space, defined by a specific metric. Participants are tasked with deriving the relationship between proper time and the radial coordinate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the Christoffel symbols and apply the geodesic equation, leading to a set of differential equations. Some participants question the necessity of focusing on massless geodesics, while others suggest using reduction of order as a method to simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different approaches to the problem, including verifying calculations and discussing the implications of assumptions. There is no explicit consensus on the next steps, but various lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a potential oversight regarding the requirement for massless geodesics, which is confirmed as necessary by the original poster. The complexity of the derived equations and the relationship between variables is also noted.

physicus
Messages
52
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



We consider global AdS given by the coordinates (\rho,\tau, \Omega_i), i=1,\ldots,d and the metric
ds^2=L^2(-cosh^2\,\rho\,d\tau^2+d\rho^2+sinh^2\,\rho\,d \Omega_i{}^2)
Find the trajectory \tau(\rho), radially-directed geodesics, strating from \rho=\rho_0 with proper time \tau(\rho_0).


Homework Equations



Geodesic equation: \frac{d^2x^{\mu}}{d \lambda^2}+\Gamma^\mu_{\nu \alpha}\frac{dx^\nu}{d \lambda}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d \lambda}=0


The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the Christoffel symbols to obtain the following non-zero components:
\Gamma^\rho_{\tau\tau}=sinh\,\rho
\Gamma^\phi_{ii}=-cosh\,\rho
\Gamma^\tau_{\rho\tau}=\Gamma^\tau_{\tau\rho}=tanh\,\rho
\Gamma^i_{\rho i}= \Gamma^i_{i\rho}=coth\,\rho

Using the geodesic equation this yields:
\frac{d^2\rho}{d\lambda^2}+sinh\,\rho\,\left(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\right)^2-\sum_i cosh\,\rho\,\left(\frac{d\Omega_i}{d\lambda}\right)^2=0
\frac{d^2\tau}{d\lambda^2}+2tanh\,\rho\,\frac{d \rho}{d\lambda}\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}=0
\frac{d^2\Omega_i}{d\lambda^2}+2coth\,\rho\,\sum_j \frac{d \rho}{d\lambda}\frac{d\Omega_j}{d\lambda}=0

We are looking for radially directed geodesics, i.e. try if there are solutions with \frac{d \Omega_i}{d\lambda}=0. Since this ansatz leads to \frac{d^2 \Omega_i}{d\lambda^2}=0 it is consistent with the above equations. Therefore, we can simplify:
\frac{d^2 \rho}{d\lambda^2}+sinh\,\rho\,\left(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\right)^2=0 (*)
\frac{d^2\tau}{d\lambda^2}+2tanh\,\rho\,\frac{d \rho}{d\lambda}\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}=0

Since we look for massless geodesics we require
g_{\mu\nu}\frac{dx^\mu}{ \lambda}\frac{dx^\nu}{d \lambda}=0
\Rightarrow -cosh\,\rho\,\left(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\right)^2+\left(\frac{d\rho}{d\lambda}\right)^2+\sum_i sinh\,\rho\,\left(\frac{d\Omega_i}{d\lambda}\right)^2=0
\Rightarrow -cosh\,\rho\,\left(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\right)^2+\left(\frac{d\rho}{d\lambda}\right)^2 = 0

We can use this to simplify (*) to get
\frac{d^2\rho}{d\lambda^2}+tanh\,\rho\,\left(\frac{d\rho}{d\lambda}\right)^2=0

However, I still don't see a solution. Does anyone have an idea?

Cheers, physicus
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jadyliber
Physics news on Phys.org
physicus said:
I calculated the Christoffel symbols to obtain the following non-zero components:
\Gamma^\rho_{\tau\tau}=sinh\,\rho
\Gamma^\phi_{ii}=-cosh\,\rho

These two Christoffels were wrong. It should be
\Gamma^\rho_{\tau\tau}=sinh\,\rho\,cosh\,\rho
\Gamma^\phi_{ii}=-sinh\,\rho\,cosh\,\rho

However, I end up with the same equation.
 
Try reduction of order. Set

u = \frac{d\rho}{d\lambda},

so that

\frac{d^2 \rho}{d\lambda^2} = \frac{du}{d\lambda} = \frac{du}{d\rho} \frac{d\rho}{d\lambda} = \frac{du}{d\rho}u.
 
physicus said:

Homework Statement



Since we look for massless geodesics we require
g_{\mu\nu}\frac{dx^\mu}{ \lambda}\frac{dx^\nu}{d \lambda}=0

Why are you looking for massless geodesics? Is this required?
 
Sorry, I forgot the "massless" in the problem statement. It is indeed required.

I try reduction of order u=\frac{d\rho}{d\lambda}, v=\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}.

This yields
\frac{du}{d\lambda}+tanh\,\rho\,u^2=0
Since \frac{du}{d\lambda}=\frac{du}{d\rho}u we get
\frac{du}{d\rho}=-tanh\,\rho\,u
\Rightarrow u=\frac{1}{cosh\,\rho}
\Rightarrow \frac{d\rho}{d\lambda}=\frac{1}{cosh\,\rho}

Also, from the second equation \frac{d^2\tau}{d\lambda^2}+2tanh\,\rho\,\frac{d \rho}{d\lambda}\frac{d\tau}{d \lambda}=0
\Rightarrow \frac{dv}{d\lambda}+2tanh\,\rho\,\frac{d\rho}{d \lambda}v=0
Since \frac{dv}{d\lambda}=\frac{dv}{d\rho}\frac{d\rho}{d\lambda}
\Rightarrow \frac{dv}{d\rho}+2tanh\,\rho\,v=0
\Rightarrow \frac{dv}{v}=-2tanh\,\rho\,d\rho
\Rightarrow log\,v=-2log\,cosh\,\rho
\Rightarrow v=\frac{1}{cosh^2\,\rho}
\Rightarrow \frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}=\frac{1}{cosh^2\,\rho}

This is in agreement with the third equation I found:
-cosh^2\,\rho\,\left(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\right)^2+\left(\frac{d\rho}{d\lambda}\right)^2=0

We want to find \tau(\rho). Can we conclude the following?
\frac{d\tau}{d\rho}=\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\frac{d \lambda}{d\rho}= \frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\left(\frac{d\rho}{d\lambda}\right)^{-1}=\frac{1}{cosh\,\rho}

This would yield: \tau(\rho)=2tan^{-1}(tanh(\rho/2))+\tau(\rho_0)
This seems a bit complicated. Is it right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K