Solving schrodinger equation for quarkonium

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the Schrödinger equation for quarkonium, specifically Charmonium and Bottomonium, and the implications of energy levels associated with different quantum numbers. Participants explore theoretical aspects, including the role of spin-orbit coupling and the Dirac equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes confusion regarding the independence of the Schrödinger equation from the quantum number "ml" and questions why the mass of states with different "ml" is not equal as stated in the PDG book.
  • Another participant explains that the different energy levels of quarkonium arise from spin-orbit coupling, detailing how the two quark spins can couple in different ways, leading to distinct energy levels for specific angular momentum states.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the implications of eigenvalues in this context, questioning whether differences in mass should exist.
  • It is mentioned that L and S have definite values for each state, and while they commute with the Hamiltonian, the Hamiltonian's dependence on spin and orbital angular momentum leads to different energy levels for each state.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of quantum numbers on energy levels, with some agreeing on the role of spin-orbit coupling while others remain uncertain about the relationship between eigenvalues and mass differences.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the application of the Schrödinger equation and the Dirac equation in this context, as well as the specific conditions under which the energy differences arise.

nasibaba
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've tried to solve Schrödinger equation for Charmonium and Bottomonium and there are some problems with that :

1. As we know the Schrödinger equation is independent from quantum number "ml" so there would be same Energy for different "ml" for a specific n. But what we see in PDG book is some how confusing, according to this book the mass of states with different "ml" are not equal !
Why this happens and what does it mean ?

2.How can I do the same with dirac equation?! Is there any specific code ?

thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The different energy levels of quarkonium are due to spin-orbit coupling. The two quark spin 1/2's can couple two ways: S = 0 and S = 1. If for example we take L = 1, the different energy levels will be 1P1 for S = 0, and 3P0, 3P1 and 3P2 for S = 1, J = 1, 2, 3.
 
First, thank you bill for answering me

I know what you've said but they are eigenvalues !
So there wouldn't be any difference in the mass !

Or I'm wrong :(
 
Last edited:
L and S have definite values for each state, since they commute with the Hamiltonian. That just means you can label the states according to the eigenvalues of L and S. However since the Hamiltonian depends on S1·S2 and L·S, each state has a different energy. This is analogous to the line splitting you find in other systems, like atoms and also in positronium.
 
oh, I got it :)

really really thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K