Solving Science Questions: Balancing Equations & Naming Compounds

  • Thread starter Thread starter cuthbertsnow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary
Balancing chemical equations requires ensuring that the number of each type of atom is equal on both sides of the equation. However, discrepancies can arise when the reaction is written out, often due to improper representation of compounds or missing coefficients. To correct this, one must ensure that the correct formulas and coefficients are used in the written equation, reflecting the balanced state accurately.When naming compounds, Roman numerals and prefixes are employed to clarify the oxidation states or quantity of atoms, especially when multiple compounds exist with the same base name. For example, "iron oxide" is ambiguous because it could refer to multiple iron oxides, necessitating the use of Roman numerals to specify whether it is iron (II) oxide or iron (III) oxide. In contrast, names like "zinc oxide" do not require additional clarification since there is only one form of zinc oxide, making it unambiguous. Using Roman numerals for zinc oxide is not incorrect, but it is unnecessary.
cuthbertsnow
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1) How come when I balance chemical equations they are balanced when I sort the amount of each element, but writing the reaction equation out is not correct? What do you need to do when writing it out after?


2) When do you use roman numberals and prefixes when writing the names for compounds?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
cuthbertsnow said:
1) How come when I balance chemical equations they are balanced when I sort the amount of each element, but writing the reaction equation out is not correct? What do you need to do when writing it out after?

Please give an example, it is not clear what you mean.

2) When do you use roman numberals and prefixes when writing the names for compounds?

In general - when the name given without them is not clear. There is only one zinc oxide, so name "zinc oxide" is unambiguous. There are three iron oxides, so name "iron oxide" needs clarification.

Note that calling zinc oxide "zinc (II) oxide" is not an error, even if you are stating the obvious.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K