MHB Solving Sigma(210): Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vi Nguyen
  • Start date Start date
Vi Nguyen
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
how to solve this problem
Find sigma(210)\sigma\sigma
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome to the forum!

Vi Nguyen said:
how to solve this problem
Find sigma(210)\sigma\sigma
I am not sure what sigma ($\Sigma$ or $\sigma$) means in your problem. Perhaps you can use the formula editor to the right of the edit box to enter the formula exactly as it appears in the problem statement, as well as the complete problem statement itself. LaTeX symbol codes (they start with a backslash) should be enclosed in the $$...$$ tags.
 
Vi Nguyen said:
how to solve this problem
Find sigma(210)\sigma\sigma

Hi Vi Nguyen! Welcome to MHB! ;)

The only sigma function I know, is the sum-of-divisors function. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisor_function .

In that case we have:
$$\sigma(210)=576$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
953
Replies
1
Views
930
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top