Solving the Mystery of \ln{v_{i}} in an Expression

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Polymath89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression Mystery
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the logarithm of a product expression related to the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) in a GARCH(1,1) model. The original expression is \prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}], which simplifies to \sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v_{i}}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v_{i}}) after accounting for the variance terms. The confusion arises from the transition between using a constant variance v and a variable variance v_{i}, impacting the logarithmic transformation of the expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)
  • Familiarity with GARCH(1,1) models
  • Knowledge of logarithmic properties in mathematical expressions
  • Basic concepts of probability distributions, particularly the normal distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the GARCH(1,1) model and its applications in financial time series analysis
  • Learn about the properties of logarithms in the context of statistical models
  • Explore Maximum Likelihood Estimation techniques in depth
  • Investigate the implications of variance estimation in time series forecasting
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, financial analysts, and data scientists interested in time series modeling, particularly those working with GARCH models and MLE techniques.

Polymath89
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I have a problem taking the log of this expression \prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]

Now I would get \ln({\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}})(\sum_{i=1}^m{\frac{-u_{i}^2}{v_{i}}})

The author gets, by ignoring the constant multiplicative factors, \sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v_{i}}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v_{i}})

Can anybody tell me where the \ln{v_{i}} comes from and what I have done wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Polymath89 said:
I would get \ln({\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}})(\sum_{i=1}^m{\frac{-u_{i}^2}{v_{i}}})

You are missing m (not that it answers your question).
 
Do you mean

\prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]

or

\prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v_i}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]
 
I'm sorry, I just noticed the difference in the terms, first the author uses v as a constant, so he starts with this term:

\prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v})}]

and then he gets, by ignoring the constant multiplicative factors:

\sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v})

Then he replaces v with v_{i}, so \prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v_i}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]

and gets \sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v_{i}}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v_{i}})

To put all of this in perspective, the author tries to estimate parameters of a GARCH(1,1) model and the first part(with v as a constant) is supposed to be an example of a Maximum Likelihood Estimation, where he estimates the variance v of a random variable X from m observations on X when the underlying distribution is normal with zero mean. Then the first term is just the likelihood of the m observations occurring in that order.
For the second part with v_{i}, he uses MLE to estimate the parameters of the GARCH model. v_{i} is the variance for day i and he assumes that the probability distribution of u_{i} conditional on the variance is normal. Then he gets \prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v_i}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]

and \sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v_{i}}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v_{i}})
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K