Solving the Ode Emden-Fowler Equation: A Scientist's Perspective

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kamke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the Ode Emden-Fowler equation, specifically the case represented by the differential equation y'' = y^2/x. A particular solution identified is y(x) = 2/x, which aligns with Kamke's differential equation 6.73 for n=2. The conversation highlights the historical context of this equation and acknowledges the complexity of implicit solutions provided by tools like Maple.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order differential equations
  • Familiarity with Kamke's differential equations
  • Knowledge of implicit solutions in differential equations
  • Experience with mathematical software such as Maple
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Kamke's differential equations, focusing on section 6.73
  • Explore the methods for solving second-order differential equations
  • Learn about implicit solutions and their applications in differential equations
  • Investigate the capabilities of Maple for solving complex differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in applied mathematics, and students studying differential equations will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the Ode Emden-Fowler equation and its solutions.

kamke
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,
y'' = y^2/x
y(x) = ?
Trial and error: y(x) = 2/x.
I am glad to get a particular solution too.
Thanks,
kamke
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dear Kamke,

You of all people should know that this is a special case of Kamke's differential equation 6.73! But indeed, when you wrote the book, there wasn't much known about this equation.
Here's what is said in the book, translated in English:
..
u^{''}=y^n x^{1-n}
for the special case that n=2, one solution is 2/x^2

Well, I am glad that after 65 years, you've managed to correct your mistake.

By the way, also Maple gives a very complicated implicit solution, so I can't help you further.
 
Dear Bigfooted,

Thanks.

Erich Kamke (1890-1961) German mathematician
u'' = x^(1-n)*u^n
n = 2
u'' = x^(-1)*u^2
u(x) = 2/x (+ u ≡ 0)
I take great interest in implicit solution.

kamke
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K