Solving the Quantum State Problem: Expressing Psi with Orthogonal States

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on expressing a quantum state, Psi, in terms of two new orthogonal states, Psi3 and Psi4. The user initially struggles with calculating coefficients for these states, despite knowing how to work with different basis vectors. Participants suggest using the inner product to derive the coefficients and clarify that the inner product's associative property can simplify the calculations. The user eventually gains understanding, realizing the importance of treating the bra and ket notation correctly when they are sums. The conversation concludes with a successful grasp of the method to express Psi in the desired form.
Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement



I have a quantum state

\mid \Psi \rangle= a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle + a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle

wheres as psi1 and psi are normalized orthognal states.

Not I want to express the psi with the following two states

\mid \Psi_3 \rangle = \frac {1}{\sqrt{2}} ( \mid \Psi_1 \rangle +\mid \Psi_2 \rangle)

and

\mid \Psi_3 \rangle = \frac {1}{\sqrt{2}} ( \mid \Psi_1 \rangle -\mid \Psi_2 \rangle)

Homework Equations




-

The Attempt at a Solution




Well, I don't have much of an idea actually. I know how to calculate coefficients if I have different basis vectors, but that doesn't seem to help here. Can anyone give me a little hint on how to approach this?

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is essentially this:

You want to express \mid \Psi \rangle in terms of the two orthogonal basis vectors \mid \Psi_{3} \rangle and \mid \Psi_{4} \rangle.

This means that
\mid \Psi \rangle = c_{3}\mid \Psi_{3} \rangle + c_{4}\mid \Psi_{4} \rangle

and your goal is to determine these two coefficients.

I'm not sure why your usual methods don't work here; they should: Clearly,
\langle \Psi_{3}\mid \Psi \rangle = c_{3}
and so on in the usual fashion. Give it another shot.
 
If I do this I get to the following expression

\langle \Psi_3 \mid \Psi \rangle = \langle \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} (\langle \Psi_1 \mid + \langle \Psi_2 \mid) \mid(a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle +a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle) \rangle

But I don't know how to ease this expression up a bit.
 
hey,don't you think you should just solve it like an algebraic eqn.and get psi1 and psi2 in terms of psi3 and psi4(there is an error with third eqn) and just substitute back.
 
I think I should do it the way Fightfish told me to. I tried it also your way before that was my idea aswell, but that didn't work out for me.
 
they are rather same.
 
Lindsayyyy said:
If I do this I get to the following expression

\langle \Psi_3 \mid \Psi \rangle = \langle \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} (\langle \Psi_1 \mid + \langle \Psi_2 \mid) \mid(a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle +a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle) \rangle

But I don't know how to ease this expression up a bit.

The inner product is associative. So,
(\langle \Psi_1 \mid + \langle \Psi_2 \mid) (a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle +a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle) = a_1 \langle \Psi_1\mid \Psi_1\rangle + a_2\langle \Psi_1 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle + a_1\langle \Psi_2\mid\Psi_1\rangle + a_2 \langle \Psi_2\mid\Psi_2\rangle

You could do it Andrien's way as well, but the method above is a general one that is easily applicable to most cases, especially when working with an infinite Hilbert space.
 
Alright. Thank you very much. I understood it now. I was actually confused that the bra and kets are sums. I know how to deal with it when I have an operator as a sum but that was new to me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K