Solving the Quantum State Problem: Expressing Psi with Orthogonal States

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing a quantum state, represented as \(\mid \Psi \rangle = a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle + a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle\), in terms of two new orthogonal states, \(\mid \Psi_3 \rangle\) and \(\mid \Psi_4 \rangle\). Participants are exploring the implications of using orthogonal states and the relationships between coefficients in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to express the original state in terms of the new basis vectors and question why traditional methods for calculating coefficients seem ineffective in this context. There are attempts to manipulate inner products to derive the coefficients.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, suggesting methods for calculating the coefficients. There is an acknowledgment of confusion regarding the manipulation of sums in the context of bra-ket notation, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential errors in the formulation of the states and the need for clarity in the algebraic manipulation of quantum states. Participants are navigating the complexities of expressing states in different bases while adhering to the principles of quantum mechanics.

Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement



I have a quantum state

[tex]\mid \Psi \rangle= a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle + a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle[/tex]

wheres as psi1 and psi are normalized orthognal states.

Not I want to express the psi with the following two states

[tex]\mid \Psi_3 \rangle = \frac {1}{\sqrt{2}} ( \mid \Psi_1 \rangle +\mid \Psi_2 \rangle)[/tex]

and

[tex]\mid \Psi_3 \rangle = \frac {1}{\sqrt{2}} ( \mid \Psi_1 \rangle -\mid \Psi_2 \rangle)[/tex]

Homework Equations




-

The Attempt at a Solution




Well, I don't have much of an idea actually. I know how to calculate coefficients if I have different basis vectors, but that doesn't seem to help here. Can anyone give me a little hint on how to approach this?

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is essentially this:

You want to express [itex]\mid \Psi \rangle[/itex] in terms of the two orthogonal basis vectors [itex]\mid \Psi_{3} \rangle[/itex] and [itex]\mid \Psi_{4} \rangle[/itex].

This means that
[itex]\mid \Psi \rangle = c_{3}\mid \Psi_{3} \rangle + c_{4}\mid \Psi_{4} \rangle[/itex]

and your goal is to determine these two coefficients.

I'm not sure why your usual methods don't work here; they should: Clearly,
[itex]\langle \Psi_{3}\mid \Psi \rangle = c_{3}[/itex]
and so on in the usual fashion. Give it another shot.
 
If I do this I get to the following expression

[tex]\langle \Psi_3 \mid \Psi \rangle = \langle \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} (\langle \Psi_1 \mid + \langle \Psi_2 \mid) \mid(a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle +a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle) \rangle[/tex]

But I don't know how to ease this expression up a bit.
 
hey,don't you think you should just solve it like an algebraic eqn.and get psi1 and psi2 in terms of psi3 and psi4(there is an error with third eqn) and just substitute back.
 
I think I should do it the way Fightfish told me to. I tried it also your way before that was my idea aswell, but that didn't work out for me.
 
they are rather same.
 
Lindsayyyy said:
If I do this I get to the following expression

[tex]\langle \Psi_3 \mid \Psi \rangle = \langle \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} (\langle \Psi_1 \mid + \langle \Psi_2 \mid) \mid(a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle +a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle) \rangle[/tex]

But I don't know how to ease this expression up a bit.

The inner product is associative. So,
[tex](\langle \Psi_1 \mid + \langle \Psi_2 \mid) (a_1 \mid \Psi_1 \rangle +a_2 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle) = a_1 \langle \Psi_1\mid \Psi_1\rangle + a_2\langle \Psi_1 \mid \Psi_2 \rangle + a_1\langle \Psi_2\mid\Psi_1\rangle + a_2 \langle \Psi_2\mid\Psi_2\rangle[/tex]

You could do it Andrien's way as well, but the method above is a general one that is easily applicable to most cases, especially when working with an infinite Hilbert space.
 
Alright. Thank you very much. I understood it now. I was actually confused that the bra and kets are sums. I know how to deal with it when I have an operator as a sum but that was new to me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
746