Solving the Velocity of Two Tied Bricks Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Norway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two bricks of different masses tied together and released from a stationary position. The objective is to determine the velocity of the bricks when one brick is at a specific height relative to the other. The subject area includes dynamics and the application of Newton's laws of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on each brick and the application of Newton's second law. Some suggest considering the system as a falling block and question the relationship between acceleration, time, and speed.

Discussion Status

Multiple participants have provided insights and attempted various methods to solve the problem. Some have expressed confusion over their calculations, while others have encouraged a step-by-step approach to clarify the reasoning. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of forces and equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific values for gravitational acceleration and the masses of the bricks. There is a noted lack of consensus on the correct approach, with several interpretations being explored. Some participants express uncertainty about their previous attempts and results.

Norway
Messages
50
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Two bricks with mass = 1,0 kg and 1,5 kg is tied together with a thin line going through two rings (with no friction). First, we hold the heaviest brick up so that the two bricks hang still at equal height. Then we'll remove our hand so that the bricks start moving. What is the velocity of the bricks when the lightest brick is 0,26 m higher than the heaviest brick?

Tried to illustrate it, but I'm no good with Paint. But hey, I tried :) Hope you get something out of it.
271580.jpe



Homework Equations


Don't know.
F=ma
G=mg
Newtons Laws


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm sorry, but I've just sit here all night and stared at this task. I just have no clue. I know you don't like helping people who can't show their work, but I hope someone could still help me. I'm clueless.

Thank you very, very much!

Btw, the answers supposed to be 0,71 m/s.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good way to start would be to consider the forces acting on each brick and then apply Newton's second law to each brick individually.
 
Ignore the pulley for now and just imagine a falling block.
What do you know about the accelaration of a falling object?
What equation links time / speed / accelaration ?
 
Wow, thanks for the quick replies!
I'll try and have another look on it as you said, Hootenanny :)
mgb_phys; well, the acceleration is 9,81 m/s^2, right? And its Force is mass * acceleration. I'll try to use that. Meanwhile, thanks for any further help! :D
As for that equation, do you mean v=v0+at?

Thanks a lot guys :)
 
Last edited:
Well, I couldn't do it. At first I tried a method which returned the answer v = 0,92 m/s which obviously was wrong. Then I tried another approach, but that returned v=1,6 m/s, which also was wrong, obviously.

So, are there any other who can give me some hints?
 
Norway said:
Well, I couldn't do it. At first I tried a method which returned the answer v = 0,92 m/s which obviously was wrong. Then I tried another approach, but that returned v=1,6 m/s, which also was wrong, obviously.

So, are there any other who can give me some hints?
What did you actually try?
 
Sorry, didn't have much time when I posted the previous post, but this is what I tried:
(M is the brick with 1,5kg, m is the brick with 1,0kg)

GM = 1,5 kg * 9,81 m/s2 = 14,715 N
Gm = 1.0 kg * 9,81 m/s2 = 9,81 N

Looking at M (wow, just realized you support TeX :D ):
[tex]\Sigma F = Ma \Rightarrow a = \frac{\Sigma F}{M} = \frac{4,905 N}{1,5 kg} = 3,27 m<br /> /s^2[/tex]

Wrongly assumed that the acceleration was 3,27 metres per second squared.

[tex]v^2 = v_0^2 + 2as[/tex]
[tex]v = \sqrt{2 \cdot 3,27 m/s^2 \cdot 0,13 m} = 0,92 m/s[/tex]
Which was wrong, of course. (Kinda embarrassing writing down your work when you know it's wrong, but.. :D )

Tried again: Can't remember what I was thinking, but obviously something very wrong, as this turned out very bad.
[tex]G_M - S = Ma[/tex]
[tex]G_m - S = ma[/tex]
[tex]S = G_m - ma = 9,81 N[/tex]

[tex]G_M - G_m + ma = Ma[/tex]
[tex]G_M - G_m = a(M-m)[/tex]
[tex]a = \frac{G_M - G_m}{M - m} = \frac{4,905 N}{0,5 kg} = 9,81 m/s^2[/tex]
which obviously was even worse. Continued with it even though, and got v = 1,6 m/s.

Well.. - yeah. :)
 
Sorry, but somethings gone wrong here. I can't edit posts, so I posted a new one and can't delete the old one. Sorry. But I split the lines in the last post, so it's easier to see. Thanks
 
Okay, you've got the right idea but are making a few small slips along the way. Let's do this step by step.

Intuitively, in which direction will the system move? In other words, which block will move upwards and which block will move downwards? We shall take this direction as positive.

Now write down the sum of the forces acting on each block, taking note of the direction. If the force acts in the same direction as the block is traveling then the force should be positive. Otherwise, the force should be negative.

Do you follow?

P.S. I've deleted your previous post. You can edit or delete your own posts (up to one hour after to posted them) by clicking the edit button and then either editing the post directly, or selecting the delete option.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K