Solving the Wallis Product: Constructing Rectangles for $\pi/2$

  • Thread starter Thread starter DivGradCurl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the Wallis Product, which states that π/2 can be expressed as an infinite product of ratios. Participants detail the construction of rectangles with alternating areas and derive the ratios of width to height for each rectangle. They emphasize the importance of expressing each ratio in terms of previous terms to maintain clarity in the calculations. By keeping the fractional factors visible, the progression aligns with the Wallis Product, confirming that the limit of the ratios approaches π/2. The conversation concludes with a confirmation that the approach effectively demonstrates the desired limit.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Folks, I have a problem in my calculus textbook about the Wallis Product

\frac{\pi}{2} = \frac{2}{1} \cdot \frac{2}{3} \cdot \frac{4}{3} \cdot \frac{4}{5} \cdot \frac{6}{5} \cdot \frac{6}{7} \cdot \cdots

"We construct rectangles as follows. Start with a square of area 1 and attach rectangles of area 1 alternately beside or on top of the previous rectangle (see figure). Find the limit of the ratios of width to height of these rectangles."

Here's what I've got:

R_1 = \frac{W_1}{H_1} = \frac{1}{1} = 1

R_2 = \frac{W_2}{H_2} = \frac{W_1 + \frac{1}{H_2}}{H_1} = \frac{2}{1} = 2

R_3 = \frac{W_3}{H_3} = \frac{W_2}{H_2 + \frac{1}{W_3}} = \frac{2}{3/2} = \frac{4}{3}

R_4 = \frac{W_4}{H_4} = \frac{W_3 + \frac{1}{H_4}}{H_3} = \frac{8/3}{3/2} = \frac{16}{9}

R_5 = \frac{W_5}{H_5} = \frac{W_4}{H_4 + \frac{1}{W_5}} = \frac{8/3}{15/8} = \frac{64}{45}

Since all previous parts of this problem are about the Wallis Product, it would not be surprising to find out that the limit of the ratios of width to height of those rectangles is \frac{\pi}{2}. It doesn't seem to be appropriate to simply state it, though.

If n is even, then

W_n = W_{n-1} + \frac{1}{H_n} and H_n = H_{n-1}

and so

R_n = \frac{W_n}{H_n} = \frac{W_{n-1} + \frac{1}{H_n}}{H_{n-1}}

If n is odd, then

W_n = W_{n-1} and H_n = H_{n-1} + \frac{1}{W_n}

and so

R_n = \frac{W_n}{H_n} = \frac{W_{n-1}}{H_{n-1} + \frac{1}{W_n}}

Thus, we find


\lim _{n\to \infty} \frac{W_{n-1} + \frac{1}{H_n}}{H_{n-1}} = \lim _{n\to \infty} \frac{W_{n-1}}{H_{n-1} + \frac{1}{W_n}}

However, I don't know how to proceed so that I find

\lim _{n\to \infty} R_n = \frac{\pi}{2}

Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks.

PS: THE FIGURE IS ATTACHED.
 

Attachments

  • figure.JPG
    figure.JPG
    6 KB · Views: 869
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I think you want to express each ratio in terms of heights and widths of previous terms, not in terms of the current term. Then be sure to keep the H and W identifiable before reducing the fractions and leave the fractions factored. I added an intermediate step that you have done correctly, and idenitfied the W and H for each term in brackets.

R_1 = \frac{W_1}{H_1} = \frac{1}{1} = 1

R_2 = \frac{W_2}{H_2} = \frac{W_1 + \frac{1}{H_1}}{H_1} = \frac{1 + 1}{1}= \left[\frac{2}{1}\right] = 1\cdot\frac{2}{1}

R_3 = \frac{W_3}{H_3} = \frac{W_2}{H_2 + \frac{1}{W_2}} = \frac{2}{1 + 1/2} = \left[\frac{2}{3/2}\right] = 1\cdot\frac{2}{1}\cdot\frac{2}{3}

R_4 = \frac{W_4}{H_4} = \frac{W_3 + \frac{1}{H_3}}{H_3} = \frac{2 + 2/3}{3/2} = \left[\frac{8/3}{3/2}\right] = 1\cdot\frac{2}{1}\cdot\frac{2}{3}\cdot\frac{4}{3}

R_5 = \frac{W_5}{H_5} = \frac{W_4}{H_4 + \frac{1}{W_4}} = \frac{8/3}{3/2+3/8}= \left[\frac{8/3}{15/8}\right] = 1\cdot\frac{2}{1}\cdot\frac{2}{3}\cdot\frac{4}{3}\cdot\frac{4}{5}

R_6 = \frac{W_6}{H_6} = \frac{W_5 + \frac{1}{H_5}}{H_5} = \frac{8/3+8/15}{15/8} = \left[\frac{16/5}{15/8}\right] = 1\cdot\frac{2}{1}\cdot\frac{2}{3}\cdot\frac{4}{3}\cdot\frac{4}{5}\cdot\frac{6}{5}

R_7 = \frac{W_7}{H_7} = \frac{W_6}{H_6 + \frac{1}{W_6}}= \frac{16/5}{15/8+5/16} = \left[\frac{16/5}{35/16}\right] = 1\cdot\frac{2}{1}\cdot\frac{2}{3}\cdot\frac{4}{3}\cdot\frac{4}{5}\cdot\frac{6}{5}\cdot\frac{6}{7}

By keeping the fractional factors, you see the progression as the Wallis Product, so if you believe the given expansion, you have shown the ratio of the rectangle sides has the \pi/2 limit.
 
That's definitely it! Thank you very much.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K