A Solving this first-order differential equation for neutron abundance

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving a first-order differential equation for neutron abundance, expressed as dX_n/dt = λ - (λ + ȧλ)X_n, where λ is the neutron production rate and ȧλ is the neutron destruction rate. The user has attempted numerical methods like Euler and RK4 but encountered divergence in solutions for X_n. A suggestion is made that the equation may be classified as 'very stiff', recommending the use of the Gear method for more stable solutions. Additional resources, including a link to a relevant research paper, are provided for further assistance. The user expresses gratitude for the help received in addressing the problem.
gurbir_s
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
The time rate of change of neutron abundance ##X_n## is given by
$$\frac{dX_n}{dt} = \lambda - (\lambda + \hat\lambda)X_n$$
where ##\lambda## is neutron production rate per proton and ##\hat\lambda## is neutron destruction rate per neutron.
Given the values of ##\lambda## and ##\hat\lambda## at various values of time, I need to calculate ##X_n##.I have also calculated values of ##\lambda 's## at intermediate times. I have tried using Euler method and RK4 method to solve this equation, but the solutions for ##X_n## diverge to inf values.

[Here][2] is the link to the complete research paper "Primordial Helium Abundance and the Primordial Fireball. II" by P.J.E. Peebles.

Any help or idea on how to solve it will be appreciated : ) [1]: Data for ##\lambda 's## https://i.stack.imgur.com/lnW9M.png
[2]: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966ApJ...146..542P/abstract
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello @gurbir_s ,
:welcome: ##\qquad ## !​

It seems ([edit]: :wink: (*) ) to me you have a differential equation at hand of the so-called 'very stiff' category.
I don't know what tools you have available, but you can try to find an impementation of the Gear method.

(*) the 'primordeal fireball' in the title says it all[edit2]:
A little googling: in https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume13/2-Numerical-Approach-for-Solving-Stiff.pdf
I find
12. Hindmarsh, A. C. and Gear C.W. (1974), “Ordinary differential equation system solver”, L.L.L. Report UCID -30001, rev. 3, l.l.l. (www.netlib.org/ode/epsode.f)
Good old Fortran !

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
hello @gurbir_s ,
:welcome: ##\qquad ## !​

It seems ([edit]: :wink: (*) ) to me you have a differential equation at hand of the so-called 'very stiff' category.
I don't know what tools you have available, but you can try to find an impementation of the Gear method.

(*) the 'primordeal fireball' in the title says it all[edit2]:
A little googling: in https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume13/2-Numerical-Approach-for-Solving-Stiff.pdf
I find Good old Fortran !

##\ ##
Thank you : ) @BvU. I was struggling with this problem from quite a few days.
 
I am following someone on Youtube who has built a rocket shaped (4 proprllers) drone for the world speed record ... He was having problems with internal heat from electical control gear and battery inside the sealed rocket (about 1kw waste heat) Speed is 500km/hr , I suggested a 4mm hole in the tip of the nose and 8mm hole at rear which should alow sufficient air cooling .. I said this will increase thrust because the air exiting is hotter .. a bit similar to a ram jet ... was I correct...
Quick question that I haven't been able to find the answer to. Greenhouse gasses both warm and cool the atmosphere by slowing heat loss to space. But what would happen without GHGs? I read that the earth would be colder (though still relatively warm), but why? Without GHGs the atmosphere would still be a similar mass and still warmed by conduction from the surface, yet without a means to radiate that heat to space. Why wouldn't the atmosphere accumulate heat over time, becoming warmer? How...