MHB Solving Trig Equation: Find the Answer Quickly

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the trigonometric equation $(\sec^4 x +16)^2=2^{12}(4\tan x+1)$. The initial approach involved using the Newton-Raphson method, but a participant suggested substituting $\sec^2(x) = 1 + \tan^2(x)$ to simplify the equation to one in terms of $\tan(x)$. However, this substitution led to a more complex polynomial, ultimately requiring reliance on numerical methods for solutions. The original poster is seeking a more efficient shortcut to solve the problem without complicating it further. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of finding simpler methods for solving complex trigonometric equations.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

Do you think this problem can be approached wisely, rather than expanding it and attack it using the Newton-Raphson method (which I did)?

Problem:

Solve $(\sec^4 x +16)^2=2^{12}(4\tan x+1)$

Thanks for reading and I would appreciate it if in case, you could solve it using shortcut that I failed to acknowledge and share it with me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

Do you think this problem can be approached wisely, rather than expanding it and attack it using the Newton-Raphson method (which I did)?

Problem:

Solve $(\sec^4 x +16)^2=2^{12}(4\tan x+1)$

Thanks for reading and I would appreciate it if in case, you could solve it using shortcut that I failed to acknowledge and share it with me.

Well writing $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sec^2{(x)} = 1 + \tan^2{(x)} \end{align*}$ so that the equation is only in terms of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \tan{(x)} \end{align*}$ would be a start :)
 
Prove It said:
Well writing $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sec^2{(x)} = 1 + \tan^2{(x)} \end{align*}$ so that the equation is only in terms of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \tan{(x)} \end{align*}$ would be a start :)

Thanks, Prove It for your reply. In fact, I solved this problem by using that substitution. I am hoping if you or anyone could find a short cut to approach the problem, since the substitution method led to a more complex polynomial and I at last have to rely wholly on the Newton-Raphson method to find the approximate answers to this problem...(Thinking)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K