Solving Velocity & Angle of Proton After Glancing Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter yardy_genius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton Velocity
yardy_genius
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
can someone please demonstrate how a question such as this is solved.

A proton traveling with a velocity 6.0 × 105 m/s i
makes a glancing collision with a second proton
at rest. One of the protons is observed after the
collision to be moving with a velocity
V1 = 4.6 x 105 m/s at a 40 degree angle to the original
incoming proton’s direction.
i. Determine the velocity of the other proton
after the collision in unit vector notation
ii. Calculate the angle θ.
 
on Phys.org
What kind of material is this covering? Does it incorporate the Coulomb force between the protons? (I suppose probably not, since the "glancing collision" would have some... complications, I believe.) Or is it just treating it like a particular perfectly elastic collision?
 
WJSwanson said:
What kind of material is this covering? Does it incorporate the Coulomb force between the protons? (I suppose probably not, since the "glancing collision" would have some... complications, I believe.) Or is it just treating it like a particular perfectly elastic collision?

more on the basis of elastic collisions.

i know that the momentum in x direction is equal to the momentum in the y but i am not given a mass? but i suppose it cancels out.

here is a diagram.

[PLAIN]http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/9633/vectord.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok this is what i did,

resolving x component

V1= 6.0X 10^5 cos40
= 4.5

V2= -4.6x 10^5 sin40

=-3

therefore velocity of other proton in unit vector form = (4.5 x10^5i -3 X 10^5j)


angle between them is tan (inv) -3/4.5 = 33 degrees.

is this correct?
 
Okay, so since this is just a problem involving a perfectly inelastic collision, I'll give you a couple of morsels for thought that should get you set. If it doesn't help at all, I'll be back in the morning. Anyway:

1. Think in terms of the law of conservation of momentum and that the masses are equal to each other: you can pick an arbitrary mass m and you should still get the right answer. Otherwise, IIRC the mass of a proton is just 1.67 * 10-27kg.

2. Remember that momentum is a vector quantity and consider the implication that has on what quantities are conserved by the law of conservation of momentum.
 
WJSwanson said:
Okay, so since this is just a problem involving a perfectly inelastic collision, I'll give you a couple of morsels for thought that should get you set. If it doesn't help at all, I'll be back in the morning. Anyway:

1. Think in terms of the law of conservation of momentum and that the masses are equal to each other: you can pick an arbitrary mass m and you should still get the right answer. Otherwise, IIRC the mass of a proton is just 1.67 * 10-27kg.

2. Remember that momentum is a vector quantity and consider the implication that has on what quantities are conserved by the law of conservation of momentum.

check my previous post to see if am on the right track
 
Yeah, sorry about that. You posted while I was typing lol. And my browser just crashed a moment ago so I lost the lengthy response I typed up. Anyway, checking the answer to make sure v0 = Ʃvf...

v0 = < 6.0 * 105m/s , 0 m/s >

So you've got...

v1 = < 4.6 * 105m/s , -3.0 * 105m/s >

v2 = < 4.5 * 105m/s , -3.0 * 105m/s >

unless I'm reading this horribly wrong.

So when we add the two vectors, we should get < 6.0 * 105m/s , 0 m/s >.

What we get instead is < 9.1 * 105m/s , -6.0 * 105m/s >

Remember that the velocity of that proton you're given after the collision is indeed given by

[itex]v_{1}[/itex] [itex]= 4.5 * 10^{5}m/s < cos 40 , sin 40 >[/itex]

like you thought, and that your two final-velocity vectors have to add up to be equal to that initial velocity vector of

[itex]v_{0} = 6.0 * 10^{5}m/s < 1 , 0 >[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K