Some derivation in QFT in Curved SpaceTime by Birrell and Davies

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mad mathematician
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving equation (3.61) from equation (3.59) in "Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time" by Birrell and Davies. The user initially attempts a direct derivation but encounters discrepancies, particularly regarding the relationship between coordinate time (t) and proper time (τ). A key correction is noted: the factor of (1-v²)^(1/2) must be considered, as it is essential for accurate calculations in the context of inertial trajectories. This clarification allows the user to proceed with their reading of the text.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with concepts of curved spacetime
  • Knowledge of coordinate time and proper time distinctions
  • Ability to interpret mathematical equations in physics literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equation (3.57) in Birrell and Davies' text
  • Explore the implications of proper time in relativistic physics
  • Learn about the role of inertial trajectories in QFT
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for deriving equations in curved spacetime
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Field Theory and general relativity, will benefit from this discussion.

mad mathematician
Messages
144
Reaction score
24
I am trying to derive equation (3.61) below (the attachments are from pages 51-53).
As far as I can tell, one can get (3.61) from (3.59) directly, just plug ##x=x'## and ##t-t'=\Delta \tau##, but then there's this remark that "##(1-v^2)^{1/2}## is absorbed in epsilon". So I think my "direct derivation" must be wrong, something must be missing in their derivation.
Can you help?

1768411158030.webp

1768411168225.webp

1768411199771.webp

1768411216954.webp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mad mathematician said:
As far as I can tell, one can get (3.61) from (3.59) directly, just plug ##x=x'## and ##t-t'=\Delta \tau##...
No, because your last equation for ##\Delta\tau## is wrong since it contradicts B&D's eq. (3.57). Remember that ##t## is coordinate time and ##\tau## is proper time. For an inertial trajectory they differ by a factor of ##\left(1-v^2\right)^{1/2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mad mathematician
renormalize said:
No, because your last equation for ##\Delta\tau## is wrong since it contradicts B&D's eq. (3.57). Remember that ##t## is coordinate time and ##\tau## is proper time. For an inertial trajectory they differ by a factor of ##\left(1-v^2\right)^{1/2}##.
Ok, now I can proceed reading the book.
Great website! as always.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
850
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K