Some more of my photography

  • Context: Art 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BadgerBadger92
  • Start date Start date
BadgerBadger92
Messages
199
Reaction score
128
IMG_0403.webp
IMG_0408.webp
IMG_0407.webp
IMG_0406.webp
IMG_0404.webp
IMG_0401.webp
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, pinball1970, BillTre and 1 other person
Science news on Phys.org
And this one vs the black and white version
IMG_0409.webp
IMG_0410.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, pinball1970, sbrothy and 2 others
I don't know much about photography but isn't the first one shot with an "extented shutter time"?

EDIT: The piano looks really artsy to me. I like it. It reminds me about death and decay, but in an abstract way.

EDIT2: And for once I think the color drives the point home better.
 
You're certainly not without skill (what that's worth from a hack like me I don't know). Sometimes you hear that anyone with a camera is an artist, but I think you've got something....
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Averagesupernova and pinball1970
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy
BadgerBadger92 said:

Since you are soliciting feedback... I have some (hopefully) helpful suggestions/comments for these three.

The middle (color) image is really great- the shadow connecting basketball hoop with doorway leads the eye really effectively, and by keeping the ground not-level, you maintain a sense of tension and uncertainty in the whole image. Nice job!

By contrast, the 2 architectural photos suffer from not being perfectly rectilinear. The bottom image also has noticeable pincushion distortion (the top one may as well but it's harder to see). I'm personally not a fan of "fixing in post", but that's me. Similarly, the top image has some problem with contrast- the sky is posterized (at least on my display) and there is evidence of glare at the top of the building has glare.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy
BadgerBadger92 said:
And this one vs the black and white version

For this image, the main deficiency (IMO) is where focus has been placed. I would have expected it at the group of black keys in the lower right corner, not smack in the middle of the image. Personally, I would have used a lower f/# to narrow the depth of focus.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy
Sounds like you got some competent feedback there.
 
I can offer this although I realize it's old news:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_rectangle

EDIT: I know many of the old Renaissance painters were aware of it and utilized it, including Leonardo. It must have it's place in photography too.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
pinball1970 said:
There is something so sad about seeing an instrument left unloved. Was this in situ? An abandoned club?
I just took it at face value. Didn't really consider the back-story. But yeah, why not really?
 
  • #11
sbrothy said:
I don't know much about photography but isn't the first one shot with an "extented shutter time"?

EDIT: The piano looks really artsy to me. I like it. It reminds me about death and decay, but in an abstract way.

EDIT2: And for once I think the color drives the point home better.
Yes! I used a long shutter speed to make that blurred movement effect!
 
  • #12
My three favorites:

1779430044360.webp

1779430069759.webp

1779430086558.webp
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BadgerBadger92
  • #13
Andy Resnick said:
Since you are soliciting feedback... I have some (hopefully) helpful suggestions/comments for these three.

The middle (color) image is really great- the shadow connecting basketball hoop with doorway leads the eye really effectively, and by keeping the ground not-level, you maintain a sense of tension and uncertainty in the whole image. Nice job!

By contrast, the 2 architectural photos suffer from not being perfectly rectilinear. The bottom image also has noticeable pincushion distortion (the top one may as well but it's harder to see). I'm personally not a fan of "fixing in post", but that's me. Similarly, the top image has some problem with contrast- the sky is posterized (at least on my display) and there is evidence of glare at the top of the building has glare.
My favs are the first one and as mentioned here, the color image and also the decayed piano, again avec couleurs.

Speaking about drawing the eye:

https://photographyhero.com/golden-ratio-photography/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #14
sbrothy said:
My favs are the first one and as mentioned here, the color image and also the decayed piano, again avec couleurs.

Speaking about drawing the eye:

https://photographyhero.com/golden-ratio-photography/
I’ve used the golden ratio numerous times! It’s one of the things I’ve taught myself and different other compositional techniques.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy
  • #15
BadgerBadger92 said:
I’ve used the golden ratio numerous times! It’s one of the things I’ve taught myself and different other compositional techniques.
I don't doubt you. I just wanted to follow trough with my other post. (And hopefully get a little STEM into the thread. :smile: )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
982
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K