Some more of my photography

  • Context: Art 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BadgerBadger92
  • Start date Start date
BadgerBadger92
Messages
196
Reaction score
122
IMG_0403.webp
IMG_0408.webp
IMG_0407.webp
IMG_0406.webp
IMG_0404.webp
IMG_0401.webp
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, BillTre and DennisN
Science news on Phys.org
And this one vs the black and white version
IMG_0409.webp
IMG_0410.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, sbrothy, BillTre and 1 other person
I don't know much about photography but isn't the first one shot with an "extented shutter time"?

EDIT: The piano looks really artsy to me. I like it. It reminds me about death and decay, but in an abstract way.

EDIT2: And for once I think the color drives the point home better.
 
You're certainly not without skill (what that's worth from a hack like me I don't know). Sometimes you hear that anyone with a camera is an artist, but I think you've got something....
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
BadgerBadger92 said:

Since you are soliciting feedback... I have some (hopefully) helpful suggestions/comments for these three.

The middle (color) image is really great- the shadow connecting basketball hoop with doorway leads the eye really effectively, and by keeping the ground not-level, you maintain a sense of tension and uncertainty in the whole image. Nice job!

By contrast, the 2 architectural photos suffer from not being perfectly rectilinear. The bottom image also has noticeable pincushion distortion (the top one may as well but it's harder to see). I'm personally not a fan of "fixing in post", but that's me. Similarly, the top image has some problem with contrast- the sky is posterized (at least on my display) and there is evidence of glare at the top of the building has glare.
 
BadgerBadger92 said:
And this one vs the black and white version

For this image, the main deficiency (IMO) is where focus has been placed. I would have expected it at the group of black keys in the lower right corner, not smack in the middle of the image. Personally, I would have used a lower f/# to narrow the depth of focus.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
974
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K