Some questions about baryogenesis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on baryogenesis as outlined in Scott Dodelson's "Modern Cosmology," particularly Chapter 3. The formula presented, $$n_p[T]=g_p\space (\frac{k_b\space m_p\space T}{2\pi \hbar})^{\frac{3}{2}}\space e^{-\frac{c^2m_p}{k_B\space T}}$$, describes the number density of protons in a unit volume at thermal equilibrium. Key points include the concept of "freeze-out," where proton creation ceases, and the relationship between reaction rates and the expansion rate of the universe. The discussion highlights the unresolved nature of baryogenesis and its connection to CP-breaking physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of baryogenesis and its implications in cosmology
  • Familiarity with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis concepts
  • Knowledge of thermal equilibrium and particle physics
  • Basic grasp of cosmological expansion and reaction rates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of CP violation in baryogenesis
  • Research the role of thermal proton/anti-proton pairs in high-energy physics
  • Examine the relationship between reaction rates and cosmic expansion in detail
  • Explore advanced topics in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and its equations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in theoretical physics, cosmologists, and students studying high-energy physics and baryogenesis will benefit from this discussion.

Barry-O-Genesis
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I have some basic questions about how protons and anti-protons are formed.
I'm trying to follow Scott Dodelson's Modern Cosmology. Specifically Chapter 3. Coverage of the subject of baryogenesis appears to be missing from Dodleson's book, so I'm trying to reconstruct things on my own.

qkhA0.png


This represents the formula:$$n_p[T]=g_p\space (\frac{k_b\space m_p\space T}{2\pi \hbar})^{\frac{3}{2}}\space e^{-\frac{c^2m_p}{k_B\space T}}$$which should be the same as formula (3.6) in SI units. So, my questions are:

1. I'm a little confused about what this number is, exactly. Does this represent the number of protons in a unit volume as long as the protons are in equilibrium with their surroundings? If we're working in SI units, is this the number of protons that I'd find in a cubic meter as a function of temperature (time)?

2. Isn't there supposed to be some event that causes proton creation to eventually stop and for the change in proton density to be governed only by the expansion of space from that point out ("freeze-out")? Don't we need the reaction rate (##\gamma+\gamma=p+\bar p##) and the expansion rate (##H##) to know when "freeze-out" occurs? Where can I find a lucid discussion of this?

3. As I interpret this chart, the number of baryons today should be effectively zero. If the plasma stayed in equilibrium down to the 7 MeV range, then certainly the protons would have been converted into other particles (photons). Yes, I understand the same can be said of antimatter, but it seems like you don't even need anti-protons to make the argument that - according to this formula - there should be no protons (baryons) a ##0 MeV##. Am I reading this chart incorrectly?
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Baryogenesis generally refers not to the "freeze-out" of baryons, but instead to the CP-breaking physics which created the imbalance between normal matter and anti-matter. This is currently an unsolved problem in theoretical physics. This field of study is usually more aligned with high-energy physics than cosmology.

The freeze-out of baryons is part of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, which Dodelson starts talking about in 3.2. For the purposes of cosmology, it's generally just assumed that there are some number of protons at low temperatures, and at high temperatures there are those protons plus thermal proton/anti-proton pairs (edit: not protons, baryons. Mix of neutrons and protons at low energies). It is those thermal proton/anti-proton pairs that that equation describes, I believe.

As for the dependence upon the expansion, since the thermal proton/anti-proton particles are thermal, their number density is fully-defined by the temperature.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K